“…The hypothesis that, for every T ∈ L(X, Y * * ), for every weakly null sequence (x n ) ⊂ X, the sequence (T (x n )) is an L-set, is more general than the hypothesis that L(X, Y * * ) = K(X, Y * * ). As we shall prove in the following Proposition, the condition L(X, Y * * ) = K(X, Y * * ) is equivalent to the hypothesis in Ghenciu and Lewis's Theorem [19]. In the following example we consider two Banach spaces X and Y without the Dunford Pettis property since if one of them has the Dunford Pettis property, then the thesis of Theorem 3 follows immediately and it is contained in [19].…”