2011
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181fdf889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Duration of Residual Neuromuscular Block After Administration of Neostigmine or Sugammadex at Two Visible Twitches During Train-of-Four Monitoring

Abstract: There is a significant time gap between visual loss of fade and return of TOF ratio >0.90 after reversal of a rocuronium block by neostigmine. Sugammadex in comparison with neostigmine allows a safer reversal of a moderate NMB when relying on visual evaluation of the TOF response.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, sugammadex is more rapid and reproducible than neostigmine in restoring neuromuscular function 15 ; however, this property can induce overconfidence in its effectiveness. Therefore, anesthesiologists must follow basic principles for adequate use, specifically, adjust the dose of sugammadex to the level of spontaneous recovery, and assess its efficacy with objective neuromuscular monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In conclusion, sugammadex is more rapid and reproducible than neostigmine in restoring neuromuscular function 15 ; however, this property can induce overconfidence in its effectiveness. Therefore, anesthesiologists must follow basic principles for adequate use, specifically, adjust the dose of sugammadex to the level of spontaneous recovery, and assess its efficacy with objective neuromuscular monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Following neostigmine reversal, the time from the appearance of T 2 in TOF count to TOFR 0.9 is much longer, 26 minutes in obese patients compared to 7 minutes in nonobese patients [22] and the "unsafe period of recovery", given as the time from visual loss of fade to TOF 0.9, is 0.3 minutes with sugammadex compared to 10 minutes with neostigmine [23]. Overall, sugammadex appears to be a safer and more predictable reversal agent in obese patients.…”
Section: Use Of Rocuronium and Sugammadex In Morbidly Obese Patientsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The possible benefits and risks of this medication on patients' outcomes have yet to be delineated. [16][17][18][19] …”
Section: Possible Reversal Agentmentioning
confidence: 99%