1977
DOI: 10.2307/1914122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Durbin-Watson Test for Serial Correlation with Extreme Sample Sizes or Many Regressors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
210
0
9

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 409 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
210
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…DurbinWatson tests, however, indicated the presence of positive first-order serial correlation in the error terms (see Durbin & Watson, 1950;Durbin & Watson, 1951;Savin & White, 1977;King, 1981). This was not unexpected as error terms in regressions involving weather data tend to be positively serially correlated because weather data itself tends to be positively serially correlated (due to the fact that today's weather tends to look like yesterday's weather).…”
Section: Autoregressive (Ar) Models For Serial Correlationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…DurbinWatson tests, however, indicated the presence of positive first-order serial correlation in the error terms (see Durbin & Watson, 1950;Durbin & Watson, 1951;Savin & White, 1977;King, 1981). This was not unexpected as error terms in regressions involving weather data tend to be positively serially correlated because weather data itself tends to be positively serially correlated (due to the fact that today's weather tends to look like yesterday's weather).…”
Section: Autoregressive (Ar) Models For Serial Correlationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, the value obtained from Durbin-Watson's test (2.102) is close to a value of two. According to Savin and White [49] and David [50], a value close to two reflects the absence of autocorrelation in the residuals from the regression.…”
Section: Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weighted value of the particular model, 1.6 and 1.59, lies between the critical value from 1.60 to 1.86 for model 1 and 1.56 to 1.90 for model 2 along the corresponding test statistic (see e.g. SAVIN/WHITE, 1977, 1989-1996. 7 Even the charts of the residuals for each country illustrate this fact (see appendix figure A.1 and A.2).…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%