2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-2615(99)00057-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
291
0
20

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 468 publications
(312 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
291
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…The formulation outperforms existing models (e.g. Imai et al, 2001;Cordeau et al, 2005) and guarantees optimality; however, authors recognize that a branch-and-price algorithm should be implemented in order to solve larger instances.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulation outperforms existing models (e.g. Imai et al, 2001;Cordeau et al, 2005) and guarantees optimality; however, authors recognize that a branch-and-price algorithm should be implemented in order to solve larger instances.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was first formulated in [9] as an extension of the model proposed in [8] for the Static Berth Allocation Problem. Alternative formulations for the dynamic problem have been proposed and studied in [12], [5], and [3].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this work, Imai et al (2003) presented a formulation for the DDBSP, based on the unrelated machine scheduling problem, where vessel service was differentiated based on weights assigned to each vessel. The authors initially proposed a Lagrangian relaxation based approach, which then was replaced by the GAs based heuristic proposed by Nishimura et al (2001), due to the difficulty of applying the sub-gradient method to the relaxed problem. The authors commented only on the berth scheduling policy and not on the efficiency or consistency of the proposed GAs heuristic, which cannot be assumed to have the same behavior as the one observed for the policy presented in Nishimura et al (2001).…”
Section: Berth Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors initially proposed a Lagrangian relaxation based approach, which then was replaced by the GAs based heuristic proposed by Nishimura et al (2001), due to the difficulty of applying the sub-gradient method to the relaxed problem. The authors commented only on the berth scheduling policy and not on the efficiency or consistency of the proposed GAs heuristic, which cannot be assumed to have the same behavior as the one observed for the policy presented in Nishimura et al (2001). Imai et al (2006) presented a formulation for the DDBAP at a terminal with indented berths.…”
Section: Berth Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%