2008
DOI: 10.1115/1.2978991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dynamic Mechanical Environment of the Chondrocyte: A Biphasic Finite Element Model of Cell-Matrix Interactions Under Cyclic Compressive Loading

Abstract: Cyclic mechanical loading of articular cartilage results in a complex biomechanical environment at the scale of the chondrocytes that strongly affects cellular metabolic activity. Under dynamic loading conditions, the quantitative relationships between macroscopic loading characteristics and solid and fluid mechanical variables in the local cellular environment are not well understood. In this study, an axisymmetric multiscale model of linear biphasic cell-matrix interactions in articular cartilage was develop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
64
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown theoretically that the strain rate-dependent viscoelastic response of cartilage reduces periodic alterations of tissue strains (Suh et al, 1995) and cell deformations (Kim et al, 2008) (Freeman et al, 1994;Knight et al, 1998;Wu and Herzog, 2006;Kim et al, 2008). Pilot results obtained in a recent study on in vivo chondrocyte deformations in the intact knee loaded by muscular contractions suggest that the intrinsic viscoelastic response of chondrocytes substantially differs from that observed in isolated chondrocytes embedded in gel constructs (Abusara et al, 2011;Knight et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It has been shown theoretically that the strain rate-dependent viscoelastic response of cartilage reduces periodic alterations of tissue strains (Suh et al, 1995) and cell deformations (Kim et al, 2008) (Freeman et al, 1994;Knight et al, 1998;Wu and Herzog, 2006;Kim et al, 2008). Pilot results obtained in a recent study on in vivo chondrocyte deformations in the intact knee loaded by muscular contractions suggest that the intrinsic viscoelastic response of chondrocytes substantially differs from that observed in isolated chondrocytes embedded in gel constructs (Abusara et al, 2011;Knight et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…1) (radius = 19 mM; height = 38 mM) similar to the dimensions used previously. 16 Chondrocyte diameter and PCM outer diameter were 10 and 15 mM, respectively. The influence of the cell size was studied by varying the cell diameter to 5 and 15 mM, while the thickness of PCM was remained constant.…”
Section: Microscale Finite Element Meshmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Using a multiscale modeling approach, in which the boundary conditions of a microscale model are obtained from the solution of a macroscale (millimeter-scale) model, 16 we simulated chondrocyte-seeded cartilage TE constructs under unconfined compression loading. The macroscopic mechanical conditions within TE constructs were compared to those in mature cartilage explants under the same loading condition.…”
Section: General Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been shown by numerous authors that chondrocytes mechanical behavior is time dependent. Whether their behavior is viscoelastic (Jones et al 1999;Leipzig and Athanasiou 2005), poroelastic (Kim et al 2008), or poroviscoelastic (Trickey et al 2006) is still an open question. Moreover, Ateshian et al (2007) showed that articular chondrocytes, modeled as a protoplasm surrounded by a semipermeable membrane, would behave either as a compressible or an incompressible viscoelastic (vs. biphasic/flow-dependent viscoelastic) solid when loaded in situ in their extracellular matrix or under isolated conditions, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%