1987
DOI: 10.1016/0036-9748(87)90332-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamic organization of dislocation structures: A simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The particular choice of H and q is intentionally left unspecified, so that the current formulation is suitable for Hermite interpolation schemes of arbitrary degree (linear, cubic,…). Substituting (15) in (14) and using the analogous discretization k 2 ¼ MðuÞ m ab ðtÞ for the Lagrange multipliers, the following discrete problem is obtained X…”
Section: The Nodal Ddd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The particular choice of H and q is intentionally left unspecified, so that the current formulation is suitable for Hermite interpolation schemes of arbitrary degree (linear, cubic,…). Substituting (15) in (14) and using the analogous discretization k 2 ¼ MðuÞ m ab ðtÞ for the Lagrange multipliers, the following discrete problem is obtained X…”
Section: The Nodal Ddd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14] Only during the late-1980s, however, the term discrete dislocation dynamics (DDD) was coined in relationship to two-dimensional computer simulations aimed to shed light on the physical origins and the conditions for dislocation pattern evolution. [15][16][17] More recently, these computational tools have developed into sophisticated three-dimensional codes, [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] which are now used in massive DDD simulations for investigating the fundamental mechanisms of dislocation plasticity. Such computer simulations are now directly and successfully compared to experiments on nano-and micro-scale materials, such as thin films, 25,26 nano-indentation, 27,28 and the deformation of micro-pillars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…computationally cheap and robust methodology able to tackle large systems with flexible boundary conditions. DDP was introduced by Van der Giessen and Needleman in 1995 (Van der Giessen & Needleman, 1995) as a departure from previous two-dimensional dislocation models (Amodeo & Ghoniem, 1990a, 1990bBacon, 1967;Foreman, 1967;Gulluoglu & Hartley, 1992Gulluoglu, Srolovitz, David, LeSar, & Lomdahl, 1989;Lépinoux & Kubin, 1987). The key feature of DDP is its handling of the boundary conditions using linear superposition following the original proposal by Lubarda, Blume, and Needleman (1993).…”
Section: Figure 26mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The first such simulations involved systems of parallel dislocations and thus were effectively two-dimensional [1][2][3]. More recently, simulations involving fully three-dimensional dislocation loops and microstructures have begun to be performed [4 -8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%