The Dynamic Role of State and Nonstate Actors: Governance after Global Financial Crisis

Or, Nick H. K.; Aranda-Jan, Ana C.

doi:10.1111/psj.12201

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 76 publications

(85 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As a final point, I admit that an underlying premise in my argument presents may favour supporting a governance model that enlarges the welfare state, which is much needed today, while I recognise a dynamic role of state and non-state actors that allows thinking about governance within the terms of complexity (Or and Aranda-Jan;2017). As we look to different policy areas i.e.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

A trilemma in social extrapreneurship?

Aranda-Jan¹

2020

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social extrapreneurship needs to depart from 'trilemma' understandings. Social extrapreneurship should not be considered as such. We are not choosing if either/or particular sectoral partnerships are more suitable, but we are balancing partnerships in a both/and logic: a paradox rather than a "di/tri-lemma" form of understanding. The balance of private, public and civil sector collaboration is different given context. Our search is not for the perfect combination, but our best possible balance. We left the challenge in identifying the strategies that help us find that balance between sectors in private-public-civil collaborations.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

A trilemma in social extrapreneurship?

Aranda-Jan¹

2020

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As such, the networked approach provides a structural mechanism for shared information, resources, and expertise across policy partners (Weber & Khademian, 2008). There has been a rise in the networked governance approach since the global financial crisis of 2008 when resources for public services were constrained (Or & Aranda-Jan, 2017). In response, flexible and collaborative service arrangements across public and private sectors became a strategy for maximizing limited resources.…”

Section: Governancementioning

confidence: 99%

Analyzing Social Policy from a Network Perspective

Manit¹,

Kolpakov

Eubank

2020

ASW

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Governance models influence the approach that public service organizations take when implementing programs, policies, and practices. The networked model of governance supports the involvement of multiple actors who span organizational boundaries and roles to implement solutions to address complex social problems. This paper presents the utility of network analysis for the study of policy implementation from a network perspective. The paper describes networks within the context of social work policy implementation, basic network components, common structural variables, and sources of data for the study of policy implementation. A study of a statewide policy implementation is partially presented as an illustration of the use of network analysis in social policy research. The illustration uses primary and secondary data with network analysis techniques to identify and describe the patterns of interactions that comprise the structure of the implementation network. The illustration will present examples of the study findings to demonstrate the utility of network analysis in identifying central network actors and describing the density of the network according to different network variables. The paper concludes with a summary of the utility of network analysis in the study of policy implementation with recommendations for future research.

show abstract

“…Nick H. K. Or and Ana C. Aranda‐Jan () review the dynamic role of state and non‐state actors in governance. They first discuss the main arguments for and against the state being the main actor in governance in recent literature.…”

Section: Public Policy Research Retrospective Review Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%