2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamical behaviors of water drop impacting and bouncing on an inclined hydrophobic surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results reported above confirm that We n controls the lateral spread of the droplet in the second phase. This finding is in accordance with the literature. ,, …”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results reported above confirm that We n controls the lateral spread of the droplet in the second phase. This finding is in accordance with the literature. ,, …”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This finding is in accordance with the literature. 16,29,30 Figure 6a,b portrays the temporal evolution of the droplet in the longitudinal direction post impact on PMMA and treated glass. As observed, the rate of droplet extension decreased with an increase in α during the initial stages of spread.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spreading speed of the lower edge of water droplets is faster than the upper edge, and the spreading area at the down is larger than that at the up, as shown in Figure 3b. [ 35,36 ] So, the water droplets generate a higher electrical signal on the upper edge of the electrode than on the lower edge, as shown in Figure 2c,d. The higher electrical signal generated by the droplet at the electrode edge is not only driven by the potential difference but also affected by the area change rate of the droplet on both sides of the electrode edge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%