“…However, the numerical solution of Kuriyama's equations would seem to involve a large amount of computer time compared with the more approximate Takagi-Taupin equations (Takagi, 1962(Takagi, , 1969Taupin, 1964;Kuriyama, 1972) since his equations involve an extra angular variable describing the spreading out of the diffracted beams due to crystal imperfections. For certain classes of models of an imperfect crystal, and most particularly for a crystal consisting of local mosaic blocks, Kuriyama (1972) has indicated that one can expect the solution of the Takagi-Taupin equations to be very close to the solution of his more accurate equations. In crude terms, one might understand this to be so because the Takagi-Taupin equations are essentially correct for a perfect crystal and so should correctly treat the scattering within perfect-crystal mosaic blocks, while the boundary conditions between blocks may be incorporated via, say, an appropriate numerical solution procedure for the equations, as in the present work.…”