The dynamics between freight volatility and fleet size growth in dry bulk shipping markets

Abstract

This paper studies the relationship between the time-varying volatility of dry bulk freight rates and the change of the supply of fleet trading in dry bulk markets. An abundance of research has been done to understand the time-varying characteristics of freight rate volatility, yet few have discussed the determinants of freight volatility. We therefore examine freight volatility against the changes in fleet size and other shipping market variables over January 1973 to October 2010. The study employs a two-step model specification. The first step is the measurement of freight rate volatility through an AR-GARCH model; the second step is the analysis of the relationship between freight rate volatility and fleet size growth through a GMM regression. We confirm similar findings in the literature that freight rate volatility is time varying. Furthermore, the results reveal that the change in fleet size positively affects freight rate volatility, while the spot rate volatility of Capesize dry bulk exhibits a stronger reaction to the change in fleet size. The 2 results of this study contribute in a general sense to understanding the systematic risk of shipping markets.Key words: Freight markets; Freight volatility; Fleet size; GARCH\ Highlights:We examine the determinants of freight volatility in dry bulk shipping markets.We adopt a two-step model specification: a GARCH model and a GMM regression.Fleet size growth has a positive impact on freight volatility.Freight rate volatility is time varying.

Performance drivers of shipping loans: An empirical investigation

“…Shipping companies are faced with substantial operational business risks which result from large swings in freight rates, voyage and operating costs. These determine a venture's cash flow and have a profound effect on the company's operating profitability and loan repayment capability (Kavussanos and Visvikis, 2006a;Xu et al, 2011). High freight-rate volatility can increase the probability of default on shipping loans, especially when vessels are purchased at high prices and loans are based on high loan-tovalue ratios (Alizadeh and Nomikos, 2011).…”

Market orientation for sustainable performance and the inverted-U moderation of firm size: Evidence from the Greek shipping industry

“…Even the tanker market although stronger than the other two, presenting a slight increase of 5.6% from 2014, is almost half than its high in 2008. (UNCTAD, 2016) In an effort to deal with these low freight rates, companies consider alliances and mergers to form economies of scale (Tovar and Wall, 2012), new route-planning (Halvorsen-Weare et al, 2013) and structural or fleet changes (Xu et al, 2011). Further, abnormalities in the major shipping markets from mid-2012 to early 2015 have exposed shipping firms to higher risks and increased credit spreads (Kavussanos and Tsouknidis, 2014).…”

The Financing of Italian Shipping Firms

“…In addition, maritime companies are faced with substantial business risks resulting from the large queues of freight rate distributions, travel and operating costs. This leads to extremely uncertain cash flow and profoundly affects the company's ability to generate income and repay the debt (Kavussanos & Visvikis, 2006;Xu et al, 2011).…”