“…Moreover, the present study adopts a Rayleigh number of 5 × 10 7 , much higher than the value of 10 6 adopted in the study of Mao et al. (2019). Although much more time consuming for the numerical simulation, the present Rayleigh number is more consistent with the value generally attributed to the Earth, which is ~10 7 –10 9 (Whitehead & Behn 2015).…”