2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamics of electrically charged soot particles in a premixed ethylene flame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
35
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In atmospheric pressure premixed flames recent studies show that particles larger than 13 nm attain a symmetric charge distribution that agrees well with the Boltzmann equilibrium charge distribution calculated at flame temperatures (Maricq 2006;Maricq 2008;Maricq 2005). This result was explained as a consequence of diffusion charging followed by particle coagulation, which 'equilibrate' the charge fraction to the surrounding gas temperature (Maricq 2005).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In atmospheric pressure premixed flames recent studies show that particles larger than 13 nm attain a symmetric charge distribution that agrees well with the Boltzmann equilibrium charge distribution calculated at flame temperatures (Maricq 2006;Maricq 2008;Maricq 2005). This result was explained as a consequence of diffusion charging followed by particle coagulation, which 'equilibrate' the charge fraction to the surrounding gas temperature (Maricq 2005).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This result was explained as a consequence of diffusion charging followed by particle coagulation, which 'equilibrate' the charge fraction to the surrounding gas temperature (Maricq 2005). Furthermore, these works report that particles smaller than 13 nm had a lower than Boltzmann charge distribution and were entirely neutral late in the flame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is consistent with the implications of the above aerosol electrometer measurements, that the positively charged particles slightly outnumbered the negatively charged particles during the wire electrical explosion process. It follows that the fraction of uncharged (neutral) metal nanoparticles was small, which has also been observed for soot particles measured at a specific height in a premixed ethylene flame (Maricq 2005). The size distributions of the positively and negatively charged particles were shifted by approximately 50 nm toward the lower diameters for singly charged particles.…”
Section: In-situ Monitoring Downstream Of the Evaporation Chambersupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Peaks for multi-charged particles can be observed for both positively and negatively charged particles, as shown in Figure 5. This size distribution is similar to what is typical for monodisperse particles classified by an electrostatic classifier (Maricq 2005), and this is why the multicharged correction option should be selected in the instrument software. However, the fraction of multi-charged particles differed slightly from that of the Boltzmann charge distribution, because the first electrostatic classifier was used without a neutralizer.…”
Section: In-situ Monitoring Downstream Of the Evaporation Chambersupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The larger size particles, those with sizes in the range 10-100 nm, are usually referred to as soot particles and are formed in fuel-rich flame conditions characterized by a strong yellow-red luminosity. Nascent carbon nanoparticles with equivalent diameter of about 2-4 nm are generated both in sooting conditions, where they coexist with larger primary soot particles and soot aggregates, and in less fuel-rich bluish flame conditions where they are formed alone or coexist with the larger 4-10 nm particles (Maricq 2004(Maricq , 2005Dobbins 2007;Commodo et al 2015). Nascent particles were reported to be liquid-like or bidimensional structures which assume an atomically thin disk-like shape when deposited on a substrate Dobbins 2007;Abid et al 2008;Minutolo et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%