2003
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study.

Abstract: A reciprocal impact hypothesis posits an influence of gender-related traits (agency and communion) on role enactment and a reciprocal impact of role enactment on gender-related traits, for both men and women. Specifically, in this study it was predicted that agency influences career success and career success influences agency. In addition, the reciprocal influence of communion and family roles was examined. A prospective study with almost 2000 university graduates, who were tested after graduation and 1.5 yea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

38
421
1
22

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 443 publications
(482 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
38
421
1
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Further fine-grained inferential analysis, involving one-way between-groups MANOVAs indicated the only significant main effect related to gender ratings for the warmth of the Thai speaker F(1, 202) = 8.28, p<0.05 (p=0.004), η2=0.039, with female evaluations (mean=54.12, SD=12.67) significantly more favourable than those of males (mean=48.53, SD=13.05). The possibility exists that the differences may result from a greater tendency for females to prioritise warmth over competence dimensions in social cognition more broadly (see Abele, 2003). Nevertheless, this finding is particularly interesting because whilst it is perhaps unremarkable that Thai-born females would express especially high levels of ingroup loyalty with native female speakers of the Thai language, it indicates that the effect is extended to Thai females speaking in an L2 (i.e., English).…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further fine-grained inferential analysis, involving one-way between-groups MANOVAs indicated the only significant main effect related to gender ratings for the warmth of the Thai speaker F(1, 202) = 8.28, p<0.05 (p=0.004), η2=0.039, with female evaluations (mean=54.12, SD=12.67) significantly more favourable than those of males (mean=48.53, SD=13.05). The possibility exists that the differences may result from a greater tendency for females to prioritise warmth over competence dimensions in social cognition more broadly (see Abele, 2003). Nevertheless, this finding is particularly interesting because whilst it is perhaps unremarkable that Thai-born females would express especially high levels of ingroup loyalty with native female speakers of the Thai language, it indicates that the effect is extended to Thai females speaking in an L2 (i.e., English).…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Interestingly, the dual factors of status and solidarity/social attractiveness found in prior language attitude studies seem to broadly reflect the universal attitudinal dimensions of social cognition: competence (related to perceived ability and efficacy) and warmth (related to perceived friendliness and trustworthiness) (Cuddy, Fiske and Glick, 2008;Fiske, Cuddy and Glick, 2006). The primacy of these two content dimensions has been firmly established by the results of numerous studies, conducted by social psychologists, examining individuals' judgments of a range of other social groups within society, including differences in gender (e.g., Abele, 2003), race (e.g., Fiske et al, 2002), ethnicity (e.g., Kenworthy and Nicole, 2008), age (Cuddy, Norton and Fiske, 2005), and nationality (e.g., Kervyn et al, 2008). More specifically, there is considerable empirical evidence suggesting that groups of individuals perceived as both warm and competent elicit consistently positive emotions from participant judges (e.g., nurses) whilst those groups perceived as low in both dimensions elicit uniform negativity and (frequently) contempt (e.g., welfare recipients).…”
Section: Social Judgments Of Linguistic Variation In L2 English-speakmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Men are often expected to be strong, competent, and aggressive, whereas women are often expected to be weak, warm, and passive (19)(20)(21). Men are more likely than women to commit violent behaviors (22), and thus males are perceived to be more strongly associated than females with negative potencies such as violence and destruction (23,24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been also proved, that females perform better in tasks involving social odors (Chen and Haviland-Jones 2000). It is interesting whether levels of agency and communion, personality traits considered to be stereotypically masculine and stereotypically feminine respectively (Abele 2003), mediate the effect of biological sex on olfactory performance. Moreover, the observed lack of significant correlation between odor sensitivity and eagerness to engage in social activities in the healthy group in the current study may be the result of all participants being male.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inventory consists of three independent subscales: Masculinity, Femininity, and Masculinity-Femininity. The first two are commonly used to assess agency and communion respectively (Abele 2003;Helgeson 1994). The attributes of the agency (Masculinity) scale indicate competitiveness, self-confidence, and instrumentality (Sample pairs of attributes: BNot at all independent -Very independent^, BVery passive -Very active^).…”
Section: Personality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%