2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05032.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamics of S0 galaxies and their TullyFisher relation

Abstract: This paper investigates the detailed dynamical properties of a relatively homogeneous sample of disc‐dominated S0 galaxies, with a view to understanding their formation, evolution and structure. By using high signal‐to‐noise ratio long‐slit spectra of edge‐on systems, we have been able to reconstruct the complete line‐of‐sight velocity distributions of stars along the major axes of the galaxies. From these data, we have derived both model distribution functions (the phase density of their stars) and the approx… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of the ≤ R 50 /2 R 50 /2< r ≤ R 50 R 50 < r ≤ 2R 50 2R 50 < r ≤ 5R 50 5R 50 < r ≤ 10R 50 differences between the Tully-Fisher relation of S0s and spirals, while showing some small discrepancies in the offset and scatter, generally find that the S0 galaxies follow the spiral relationship, albeit with a larger scatter (e.g., Hinz et al 2003;Bedregal et al 2006, but see Mathieu et al 2002. The offset and larger scatter have been interpreted as revealing a generally older stellar population in S0 galaxies than in spirals and a range of times during which the S0 galaxies started to evolve passively (Mathieu et al 2002). However, as noted in Bedregal et al (2006), there is no strong correlation between the age of the S0 galaxies and the offset from the T-F relation for spiral galaxies.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Studies of the ≤ R 50 /2 R 50 /2< r ≤ R 50 R 50 < r ≤ 2R 50 2R 50 < r ≤ 5R 50 5R 50 < r ≤ 10R 50 differences between the Tully-Fisher relation of S0s and spirals, while showing some small discrepancies in the offset and scatter, generally find that the S0 galaxies follow the spiral relationship, albeit with a larger scatter (e.g., Hinz et al 2003;Bedregal et al 2006, but see Mathieu et al 2002. The offset and larger scatter have been interpreted as revealing a generally older stellar population in S0 galaxies than in spirals and a range of times during which the S0 galaxies started to evolve passively (Mathieu et al 2002). However, as noted in Bedregal et al (2006), there is no strong correlation between the age of the S0 galaxies and the offset from the T-F relation for spiral galaxies.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Despite the relatively small sample and the considerable technical challenges involved in determining the true rotation velocity V rot from absorption line spectra of galaxies with significant non-rotational support (see Mathieu et al 2002), some very interesting results arise. S0s lie systematically below the spiral galaxy Tully-Fisher relation in both the optical and near-infrared (Figure 1).…”
Section: Evidence From the Tully-fisher Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors consider that an offset would be evidence that S0s derive from spirals through simple fading after the gas is stripped through environmental processes (e.g. Mathieu et al 2002). However, simple truncation of star formation in spirals would not be enough to explain the offset (Bedregal et al 2006;Noordermeer et al 2008) or the higher dispersion of the S0s in the TFR (Hinz et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%