Politics of Scale 2019
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv12pnscx.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dynamics of Scale in Digital Heritage Cultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Museums and academics have for some time wrestled with perceived clashes between curatorial expertise and recognising other knowledges inclusively. Bettivia and Stainforth (2019) employ notions of 'governmentality' from in a critique of how Europeana (among others) embodies a set of political ideas in its organisation and presentation of knowledge privileging particular ideas of 'Europeanness' to the exclusion of others. What is particularly concerning with the inclusion of AI at scale in museums is how particular kinds of knowing (trained, finite, unequivocal) are inscribed in the consumption and production of culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Museums and academics have for some time wrestled with perceived clashes between curatorial expertise and recognising other knowledges inclusively. Bettivia and Stainforth (2019) employ notions of 'governmentality' from in a critique of how Europeana (among others) embodies a set of political ideas in its organisation and presentation of knowledge privileging particular ideas of 'Europeanness' to the exclusion of others. What is particularly concerning with the inclusion of AI at scale in museums is how particular kinds of knowing (trained, finite, unequivocal) are inscribed in the consumption and production of culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, work with regional organizations and some of its grant projects focus on access to hidden collections built on relationships with smaller, localized communities (Cohen, 2020). While there is not a simple dichotomy between nation and community (Bettivia and Stainforth, 2019), commonplace uses of these terms prompt consideration of how far the nation is compatible with communities in digital public spaces. Community is often embraced as a more authentic site for creating and valuing cultural heritage materials, but it can also have the effect of othering people, placing them in opposition to homogenized imaginaries of national identity (Hall, 1999;Anderson, 2006;Manguel, 2020).…”
Section: Who Are the Digital Public?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DPLA makes an appeal to the concept of nation in its designation of being “of America.” Simultaneously, work with regional organizations and some of its grant projects focus on access to hidden collections built on relationships with smaller, localized communities (Cohen, 2020). While there is not a simple dichotomy between nation and community (Bettivia and Stainforth, 2019), commonplace uses of these terms prompt consideration of how far the nation is compatible with communities in digital public spaces. Community is often embraced as a more authentic site for creating and valuing cultural heritage materials, but it can also have the effect of othering people, placing them in opposition to homogenized imaginaries of national identity (Hall, 1999; Anderson, 2006; Manguel, 2020).…”
Section: Who Are the Digital Public?mentioning
confidence: 99%