2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00742.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs

Abstract: The dynamics of ecological systems include a bewildering number of biotic interactions that unfold over a vast range of spatial scales. Here, employing simple and general empirical arguments concerning the nature of movement, trophic position and behaviour we outline a general theory concerning the role of space and food web structure on food web stability. We argue that consumers link food webs in space and that this spatial structure combined with relatively rapid behavioural responses by consumers can stron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

28
643
6
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 571 publications
(681 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(125 reference statements)
28
643
6
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, niche specialisation at the population and individual levels resulting from strong interspecific and intraspecific resource competition, respectively, may significantly limit the coupling between benthic and pelagic food-web compartments by generalist fish species . Because of the possible role of top consumers as important regulators of food-web dynamics and stability (Post et al, 2000;McCann, Rasmussen & Umbanhowar, 2005;Rooney et al, 2006), generalist fish should be considered as heterogeneous rather than homogeneous sets of individuals, potentially with both specialised and generalist trophic niches Araú jo et al, 2011). Nevertheless, relatively few trophic studies of generalist fish species have focussed on niche variation and segregation at both the population and individual levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, niche specialisation at the population and individual levels resulting from strong interspecific and intraspecific resource competition, respectively, may significantly limit the coupling between benthic and pelagic food-web compartments by generalist fish species . Because of the possible role of top consumers as important regulators of food-web dynamics and stability (Post et al, 2000;McCann, Rasmussen & Umbanhowar, 2005;Rooney et al, 2006), generalist fish should be considered as heterogeneous rather than homogeneous sets of individuals, potentially with both specialised and generalist trophic niches Araú jo et al, 2011). Nevertheless, relatively few trophic studies of generalist fish species have focussed on niche variation and segregation at both the population and individual levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9). Recently, ecologists have begun to recognize that important stabilizing structures likely materialize under nonequilibrium conditions (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Arguably, one of the main mechanisms for stability under such dynamic conditions is the tendency for complex systems to adapt to changing conditions (11,17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, little work so far has analysed stochastic food web dynamics in association with adaptive behaviour. The only example we know of is given by McCann et al (2005), who introduced white, uncorrelated noise in resource carrying capacities in quad-trophic food webs with diet switching. When a top predator selected between the top consumers in two distinct food webs, increasingly balanced consumption (i.e., stronger coupling between the food webs by the top predator) promoted stability at the level of the entire system .…”
Section: Adaptive Consumer Behaviour In Noisy Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic coupling of distinct food chains by an actively foraging top predator is regarded as important for community stability (e.g., Abrams, 2000;McCann et al, 2005;Rooney et al, 2008;Teng and McCann, 2004). This means that mobile predators can integrate over disparate energy sources (Vander Zanden and Vadeboncoeur, 2002), and pursue relatively more abundant prey while decoupling from scarce prey (McCann and Rooney, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%