1980
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0981(80)90012-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamics of the bacterial population associated with a salt marsh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
3

Year Published

1982
1982
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
22
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The seasonal development of this estuarine flora is strongly linked to temperature, which in this geographical area ranges from -1 to 25 'C yearly. Wilson and Stevenson (1980) also reported a strong relation between temperature and the bacterioplankton of a salt-marsh coastal system in South Carolina (USA), although no statistical evaluation was given. In a 2-yr study of bacteria in the brackish waters of the coastal Baltic Sea off Finland, Vaatanen (1980) found temperature to be the most significant variable in a step-wise multiple regression for total bacteria counts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seasonal development of this estuarine flora is strongly linked to temperature, which in this geographical area ranges from -1 to 25 'C yearly. Wilson and Stevenson (1980) also reported a strong relation between temperature and the bacterioplankton of a salt-marsh coastal system in South Carolina (USA), although no statistical evaluation was given. In a 2-yr study of bacteria in the brackish waters of the coastal Baltic Sea off Finland, Vaatanen (1980) found temperature to be the most significant variable in a step-wise multiple regression for total bacteria counts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have reported that temperature is an important factor regulating bacterial numbers in estuaries (Vaatanen 1980, Wilson & Stevenson 1980. Temperature appeared to control bacterial activity in spite of the presence of high amino acid concentrations in areas where phytoplankton production was high during the winter (Coffin 1986).…”
Section: Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have demonstrated that the density or -144-biomass of bacteria attached to particles in the plankton is a small percentage of the total bacteria (Hobbie et al, 1972;Burnison, 1975;Linley & Field, 1982 dominate the bacterial population in the plankton (Jones & Jannasch, 1959;Seki, 1970Seki, , 1971Paerl, 1975;Goulder, 1977;Rieman, 1978;Wilson & Stevenson, 1980;Bent & Goulder, 1981 This controversy (attachment vs. non-attachment) has clearly focused on the process of attachment for enhancing the growth of bacteria as the major factor affecting the density of bacteria attached to particles in the plankton. Very little consideration has been given to the possibility that the density of attached bacteria may be regulated in part by factors other -145-than growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%