2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11538-011-9634-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dynamics of Turing Patterns for Morphogen-Regulated Growing Domains with Cellular Response Delays

Abstract: Since its conception in 1952, the Turing paradigm for pattern formation has been the subject of numerous theoretical investigations. Experimentally, this mechanism was first demonstrated in chemical reactions over 20 years ago and, more recently, several examples of biological self-organisation have also been implicated as Turing systems. One criticism of the Turing model is its lack of robustness, not only with respect to fluctuations in the initial conditions, but also with respect to the inclusion of delays… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the case in which developmental time is fast we are able to suggest that, although delays are able to produce aberrant effects in deterministic reaction-diffusion systems, there are certain specific conditions, e.g., glycolysis kinetics with reversible-ligand binding, where pathologies in delayed Turing systems are ameliorated. This contrasts with the conclusions previously drawn [26,28,54,59] emphasizing the structural sensitivity of delayed Turning patterning. In addition, there are also conditions under which stochasticity is able to act against the dominant dynamics, thereby impairing the pattern formation mechanism (see Sec.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the case in which developmental time is fast we are able to suggest that, although delays are able to produce aberrant effects in deterministic reaction-diffusion systems, there are certain specific conditions, e.g., glycolysis kinetics with reversible-ligand binding, where pathologies in delayed Turing systems are ameliorated. This contrasts with the conclusions previously drawn [26,28,54,59] emphasizing the structural sensitivity of delayed Turning patterning. In addition, there are also conditions under which stochasticity is able to act against the dominant dynamics, thereby impairing the pattern formation mechanism (see Sec.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Due to these vastly different effects of noise it would be interesting to further investigate delayed stochastic systems by simulating them on growing domains. Although stochastic systems on growing domains may not be able to generate robust transition sequences, we might speculate that the noise could disrupt the homogeneous steady state and initiate pattern formation, thus removing the pattern breakdown which has been observed in the deterministic case [54,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7]). In an effort to understand the effect of such gene expression time-delays on pattern formation, various new two-component activator-inhibitor RD models with a fixed time delay in the reaction kinetics were developed based on various hypothethical sub-cellular gene expression processes in [7], [15], [16], [17] (see also the survey [18]). In these studies, pattern formation aspects of the time-delayed RD models were examined through a Turing-type linear stability around a homogeneous steady-state and from large-scale numerical computations of the PDE system on both fixed and slowly growing spatial domains.…”
Section: (Communicated By Shin-ichiro Ei)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the response delay between cell proliferation signalling and its subsequent effect upon growth are governed by the time scales of the cell cycle, i.e. of the order of a day or more, and such an extensive retardation also has the potential to profoundly affect the Turing instability in the same manner as gene expression [35]. In fact, when tissue growth is near-uniform and the influence of morphogen concentrations on tissue growth is small, domain growth response delays do not noticeably affect pattern formation.…”
Section: Reactant-controlled Domain Growth and Feedback Delay Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%