The Dynamics of Vertical and Horizontal Diversity in Organization and Society

Abstract

Diversity focuses on human characteristics that make people either different from or the same as each other. This article introduces the concepts of vertical and horizontal diversity. Vertical diversity evaluates difference as superior or inferior. Horizontal diversity treats difference as variation. Organizational paradigms of assimilation and separation are based on vertical diversity and treat diversity as a problem to be solved. Assimilation solves it by submergence of difference and separation by isolating difference. Often organizations in the United States take a benevolent assimilation approach to diversity. However, research shows that assimilation does not engage diversity in ways that promote learning, creativity, and organizational effectiveness. This article argues for a relational re-conceptualization of diversity as horizontal. The discussion integrates diversity paradigms with diversity perspectives, levels of self-representation, and uncertainty and certainty orientations to create an explanatory framework for the dynamics of diversity.

Developing Cultural Intelligence and Empathy Through Diversified Mentoring Relationships

“…DMRs are those in which the mentor and protégé differ in terms of group membership-membership associated with status differences in society and organizations resulting in "minority" and "majority" labeling. These differences include race, ethnicity, gender, class, disability, national origin, and sexual orientation (Awbrey, 2007). In this teaching intervention, management students (mostly White U.S.-born students attending a predominantly White, private 4-year university) were assigned to mentor adult refugees from Africa, the Middle East, South Asia, and South America who were recently resettled in the United States.…”

Realising the Business Case for Diversity: A Realist Perspective on the British National Health Service

“…Esmail et al (2005) argue that the diversity approach is organisationally universal, but most of the literature claims that diversity is contextual, which suggests that a simplistic policy transfer is untenable. Many commentators argue that organisational context is crucial (Richard, 2000;Richard et al, 2004;Andrews et al, 2005;Awbrey, 2007). This has a number of implications.…”

The Psychology of Diversity Resistance and Integration

“…Backlash takes several forms. Among the more overt is "symbolic bias," in which individuals deny that inequality exists and exhibits anger toward those who propose change to remedy it (Awbrey, 2007). "Modern bias" results in individual support of policies that provide a strategic advantage over women or minorities although the bias is not openly expressed (K. M. Thomas & Plaut, 2008).…”