2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dysconnection hypothesis (2016)

Abstract: Twenty years have passed since the dysconnection hypothesis was first proposed (Friston and Frith, 1995; Weinberger, 1993). In that time, neuroscience has witnessed tremendous advances: we now live in a world of non-invasive neuroanatomy, computational neuroimaging and the Bayesian brain. The genomics era has come and gone. Connectomics and large-scale neuroinformatics initiatives are emerging everywhere. So where is the dysconnection hypothesis now? This article considers how the notion of schizophrenia as a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

51
382
0
38

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 500 publications
(471 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
51
382
0
38
Order By: Relevance
“…Sparse rDCM may become particularly useful in the context of disorders for which global dysconnectivity has been suggested, such as schizophrenia (Anticevic et al, 2015;Bullmore et al, 1997;Friston et al, 2016;Friston and Frith, 1995;Stephan et al, 2006). In these situations, the computational framework introduced in this paper may deliver global "fingerprints" of aberrant functional integration, bringing computational phenotyping of whole-brain effective connectivity patterns in individual patients within reach (Stephan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sparse rDCM may become particularly useful in the context of disorders for which global dysconnectivity has been suggested, such as schizophrenia (Anticevic et al, 2015;Bullmore et al, 1997;Friston et al, 2016;Friston and Frith, 1995;Stephan et al, 2006). In these situations, the computational framework introduced in this paper may deliver global "fingerprints" of aberrant functional integration, bringing computational phenotyping of whole-brain effective connectivity patterns in individual patients within reach (Stephan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, cerebellar organization influences the fidelity of perceptions, detects errors, and rapidly modulates coordination. Schizophrenia may impair the proper modulation and coordination of multiple signals causing a misinterpretation of erroneous sensory associations usually suppressed by the cerebellum, resulting in the frequently noted evidence of abnormal predictive coding in the illness (17). …”
Section: Dysfunction In Regions Of the Core And Extended Motor Netmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reiterative adjustment of motor prediction to the visual inputs may be a mechanism that optimizes neural responses to sensory inputs (Friston, 2009). Impaired prediction error is an emerging framework for understanding dysfunction in illnesses such as schizophrenia (Friston et al, 2016), and it is plausible that clinical obsessions distort neural mechanisms for optimizing prediction error in OCD. Because the uncertainty of sensory onsets in the random condition is certainly greater than those in the periodic condition, it is certainly true that participants are operating under a higher degree of uncertainty (reflected in the response profiles for the periodic and random conditions).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%