2018
DOI: 10.1159/000487924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “Dysplastic Nevus” Conundrum: A Look Back, a Peek Forward

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One potential problem encountered when calculating concordance is the ambiguity among histopathologists, dermatologists, and GPs regarding classification of some lesions, particularly atypical naevus and melanoma-in-situ (one is benign and the other malignant) [ 32 ]. SCC-in-situ was categorised as pre-malignant and SCC as malignant, so clinician classification as the former and pathologist classification as the latter would be discordant; in practice, both diagnoses would be managed similarly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential problem encountered when calculating concordance is the ambiguity among histopathologists, dermatologists, and GPs regarding classification of some lesions, particularly atypical naevus and melanoma-in-situ (one is benign and the other malignant) [ 32 ]. SCC-in-situ was categorised as pre-malignant and SCC as malignant, so clinician classification as the former and pathologist classification as the latter would be discordant; in practice, both diagnoses would be managed similarly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the late 1970s "dysplastic" nevi have been known to be associated with increased risk of melanoma, especially if the patient has been diagnosed with dysplastic nevus syndrome (B-K mole syndrome). Unfortunately, nowadays the terms dysplastic nevus (DN) and dysplastic nevus syndrome are controversial, especially with regards to the histologic definition of DN and common lack of its correlation with the clinical picture [14][15][16]. What is more, there is insufficient research into the relation between dominant dermoscopic patterns including the patterns which are considered benign and the incidence of cutaneous melanoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%