2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2205.08010
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The e-value and the Full Bayesian Significance Test: Logical Properties and Philosophical Consequences

Abstract: This article gives a conceptual review of the e-value, ev (H | X) -the epistemic value of hypothesis H given observations X. This statistical significance measure was developed in order to allow logically coherent and consistent tests of hypotheses, including sharp or precise hypotheses, via the Full Bayesian Significance Test (FBST). Arguments of analysis allow a full characterization of this statistical test by its logical or compositional properties, showing a mutual complementarity between results of mathe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 78 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover these methods have excellent operational characteristics, being usually easier to implement, statistically more efficient, and exhibiting better computational performance than traditional alternatives. For technical details, many application examples, mathematical and logical characterizations, and discussion of their philosophical and epistemological consequences, see [21], [41,42], [49], [66], [67], [98,99], [108], [133][134][135], [155], [160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171][172][173][174][175].…”
Section: Final Remarks Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover these methods have excellent operational characteristics, being usually easier to implement, statistically more efficient, and exhibiting better computational performance than traditional alternatives. For technical details, many application examples, mathematical and logical characterizations, and discussion of their philosophical and epistemological consequences, see [21], [41,42], [49], [66], [67], [98,99], [108], [133][134][135], [155], [160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171][172][173][174][175].…”
Section: Final Remarks Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%