This article's purpose is thus to recover and reinterpret the evidence to provide a mechanism to enable and stimulate further research rather than continue to see scholars struggle with the fragmentary sources and (at times antiquarian) scholarship. The overarching argument presented here is that while the evidence for heresy might be slim, especially compared to some of that found elsewhere, the pattern in Scotland of a continuum of heightened concern about heresy from both church and civil authorities from the 1390s does correlate to broader European patterns. Moreover, this article argues that more consideration and attention needs to be given to the formally constituted inquisition that was in operation at this same time. 5 Most importantly, it is suggested here that inquisition of heresy was more to demonstrate a robust orthodox response by the church and the crown to the Wycliffite and Hussite challenge, and thereby to establish authority, than it was a response to the actual presence of dissent.While scholars have tended to focus on Lollardy's southward trajectory from Oxford, particularly towards London, it is not in the least bit surprising that John Wyclif's theology and teachings gained something of a foothold in Scotland. 6 Indeed, there were several channels by which Lollardy crossed the border.