2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The earliest evidence for crop cultivation during the Early Bronze Age in the southeastern Baltic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was identified in the Mesolithic, Subneolithic and Neolithic individuals, and perhaps some of the Bronze Age individuals. This finding fits well with the mixed-type economy recently proposed for the southeastern Baltic population during the Neolithic and the Early Bronze periods, based on carbon and nitrogen stable isotope data, organic residue analysis of ceramic vessels, and recent macrobotanical analyses (Piličiauskas et al 2017a(Piličiauskas et al , 2020(Piličiauskas et al , 2021Robson et al 2019). It seems that mobile stockbreeding and extensive barley farming were supplemented by the continued exploitation of wild resources for some time.…”
Section: Mobility Patternssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was identified in the Mesolithic, Subneolithic and Neolithic individuals, and perhaps some of the Bronze Age individuals. This finding fits well with the mixed-type economy recently proposed for the southeastern Baltic population during the Neolithic and the Early Bronze periods, based on carbon and nitrogen stable isotope data, organic residue analysis of ceramic vessels, and recent macrobotanical analyses (Piličiauskas et al 2017a(Piličiauskas et al , 2020(Piličiauskas et al , 2021Robson et al 2019). It seems that mobile stockbreeding and extensive barley farming were supplemented by the continued exploitation of wild resources for some time.…”
Section: Mobility Patternssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…At ca. 1300 cal BC, barley cultivation commenced throughout the region (Piličiauskas et al 2021), which was later supplemented by millet cultivation at ca. 1000 cal BC (Antanaitis-Jacobs et al 2002;Piličiauskas et al in prep).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though seals were consistently hunted in the past beyond the 15 th and 16 th centuries, they did not form the core of any diet, even in the Northern Ostrobothnian region. Farming communities on the Baltic Sea shores continued to utilise marine resources but, instead of seals, fish became one of the key components of a diet which was complemented by farming products [ 4 , 6 ]. Where sealing continued, it was a seasonal hunting practice which took part during the early spring and late autumn [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this shift seals continued to be hunted, but they no longer formed a key part of the subsistence strategy [3]. By contrast, in farming societies during the Bronze Age, the Iron Age and the historical period, the utilisation of marine resources was focused on fishing, and this was complemented by the products of farming [4][5][6]. Freshwater fish were utilised inland and, because the same species occupy the north Baltic Sea, freshwater lakes and rivers, the use of fish was unlikely to have been differentiated according to the catchment area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1; Appendix). In contrast, in the coastal lowlands of west Lithuania and the Lower Nemunas region, the archaeological material comes mainly from burial sites, although there were undoubtedly livedin hillforts and unfortified settlements (Grigalavičienė 1979;Bliujienė et al 2012;Šiaulinskas 2016;Jovaiša 2020;Minkevičius et al 2020;Vengalis et al 2020;Piličiauskas et al 2021). However, it should be admitted that, in terms of material, chronology and settlement structure, the Earliest Iron Age remains the least-known archaeological period in Lithuania.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%