2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The early academic resilience of children from low-income, immigrant families

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of this explanation, Carman et al (2018), whose sample demographics were very similar to those used here, found that ELL students scored 0.6 standard age scores higher than non-ELL students on the CogAT7. Another possible reason for ELL students being identified at a higher rate is immigrant advantage (Kao & Tienda, 1995), which is students who are born outside the United States or who have parents who are non-U.S. natives outperforming native-born students (DeFeyter et al, 2020). It is likely that many of the ELL students in this sample were first- or second-generation immigrants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support of this explanation, Carman et al (2018), whose sample demographics were very similar to those used here, found that ELL students scored 0.6 standard age scores higher than non-ELL students on the CogAT7. Another possible reason for ELL students being identified at a higher rate is immigrant advantage (Kao & Tienda, 1995), which is students who are born outside the United States or who have parents who are non-U.S. natives outperforming native-born students (DeFeyter et al, 2020). It is likely that many of the ELL students in this sample were first- or second-generation immigrants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, retention was clearly established as the poorest possible choice that can be made for students who struggle to learn the expected material on the expected timeline. This information coupled with researchers (Clotfelter et al, 2009;DeFeyter et al, 2020;Locke & Sparks, 2019;Range et al, 2012) who have determined that gains do not last from retaining students should make it clear that retention is not a viable solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, Rodríguez et al [35] found that native students performed better in science and mathematics. However, De Feyter et al [36] revealed that children of immigrants showed better attendance, higher grades, and higher scores on standardized reading and math tests in comparison to their peers from native families. In addition to this variation, a paradox is noted in educational research around immigrant students, which states that despite apparent challenges immigrant students face during their transition to the U.S., they tend to do about as well or better than their native peers [37].…”
Section: Academic Achievement For Immigrant Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%