2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The early detection of ovarian cancer: from traditional methods to proteomics. Can we really do better than serum CA-125?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
198
0
12

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
2
198
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) is the most common biomarker for ovarian screening. However as an individual marker on a single occasion, CA-125 is not sufficiently sensitive and specify to detect most cases of ovarian cancer (Gadducci et al, 2004;Nossov et al, 2008). With appropriate statistical models, combinations of several markers such as leptin, prolactin, osteopon-tin, insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II), macrophage inhibitory factor (MIF) and CA-125 have become more effective and accurate means for the detection of ovarian tumorgenesis (Visintin et al, 2008;Li et al, 2009;Sorensen et al, 2011), while no reliable method can be used to distinguish tumor stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) is the most common biomarker for ovarian screening. However as an individual marker on a single occasion, CA-125 is not sufficiently sensitive and specify to detect most cases of ovarian cancer (Gadducci et al, 2004;Nossov et al, 2008). With appropriate statistical models, combinations of several markers such as leptin, prolactin, osteopon-tin, insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II), macrophage inhibitory factor (MIF) and CA-125 have become more effective and accurate means for the detection of ovarian tumorgenesis (Visintin et al, 2008;Li et al, 2009;Sorensen et al, 2011), while no reliable method can be used to distinguish tumor stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2e), even though relatively low levels of serum CA125 have been reported in these populations. [22][23][24][25] As the mesothelin-binding ability of CA125 is a key factor for the CA125 meso assay, the difference in CA125 meso /CA125 levels between patients with endometriosis and EOC implies that this assay may have an advantage over the conventional antibody-based CA125 assay for a differential diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, current screening methods for early detection of ovarian cancer, including routine physical examination, CA125 serum assessment, and transvaginal ultrasound, have high false-positive rates and low positive predictive values ( Table 1) 20 . In fact, for a positive predictive value (PPV) of 10%, an ovarian cancer screening test would require a sensitivity of at least 75% and a specificity of greater than 99% 22 . Further, current methods of screening have not resulted in a significant impact on disease morbidity or mortality 21 .…”
Section: Challenges In Ovarian Cancer Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%