2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12110-022-09427-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Early Expression of Blatant Dehumanization in Children and Its Association with Outgroup Negativity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The group factor was intended as a proxy of age and educational level and was included in the analyses to explore the generalizability of the expected effects across groups. We do not expect differences by group in the present study as blatant dehumanization, and some of its outcomes appear early in development and remain relatively stable until adulthood (Zhou & Hare, 2022). However, there is evidence suggesting age differences in the processing of (fake) news due to digital literacy, reading comprehension, or metacognitive abilities (Gaillard et al, 2021), as well as differences in news processing depending on people's educational level (Grabe et al, 2009); therefore, we aimed to control for these variables.…”
Section: Design and Analytical Strategymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The group factor was intended as a proxy of age and educational level and was included in the analyses to explore the generalizability of the expected effects across groups. We do not expect differences by group in the present study as blatant dehumanization, and some of its outcomes appear early in development and remain relatively stable until adulthood (Zhou & Hare, 2022). However, there is evidence suggesting age differences in the processing of (fake) news due to digital literacy, reading comprehension, or metacognitive abilities (Gaillard et al, 2021), as well as differences in news processing depending on people's educational level (Grabe et al, 2009); therefore, we aimed to control for these variables.…”
Section: Design and Analytical Strategymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Also, even though we did not confirm hypothesis 1e where we expected collectivist cultures to dehumanize more in the three countries, we did observe it in the western countries. Dehumanization research has been mainly carried in Western countries where the results have been vastly replicated, however, it is unknown how it works in Eastern countries ( Zhou and Hare, 2022 ), the only interaction with the East is when evaluating different presented agents that may be from non-WEIRD countries, or with participants that are not born in Western countries but reside there. In this sense, our results show that although dehumanization also happens in Eastern countries, the way it is enacted may not be in the same way as in Western countries, at least in the case of social norms related to civility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%