Background and Aims
Global payment and accountable care reform efforts in the US may connect more individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) to treatment. We tested whether such changes instituted under an ‘Alternative Quality Contract’ (AQC) model within the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts’ (BCBSMA) insurer increased care for individuals with SUD.
Design
Difference-in-differences design comparing enrollees in AQC organizations with a comparison group of enrollees in organizations not participating in the AQC.
Setting
Massachusetts, USA.
Participants
BCBSMA enrollees aged 13–64 from 2006–2011 (three years prior to and after implementation) representing 1,333,534 enrollees and 42,801 SUD service users.
Measurements
Outcomes were SUD service use and spending and SUD performance metrics. Primary exposures were enrollment in an AQC provider organization and whether the AQC organization did or did not face risk for behavioral health costs.
Findings
Enrollees in AQC organizations facing behavioral health risk experienced no change in the probability of using SUD services (1.64% vs. 1.66%; p=0.63), SUD spending ($2,807 vs. $2,700; p=0.34) or total spending ($12,631 vs. $12,849; p=0.53), or SUD performance metrics (identification: 1.73% vs. 1.76%, p=0.57; initiation: 27.86% vs. 27.02%, p=0.50; engagement: 11.19% vs. 10.97%, p=0.79). Enrollees in AQC organizations not at risk for behavioral health spending experienced a small increase in the probability of using SUD services (1.83% vs. 1.66%; p=0.003) and the identification performance metric (1.92% vs. 1.76%; p=0.007), and a reduction in SUD medication use (11.84% vs. 14.03%; p=0.03) and the initiation performance metric (23.76% vs. 27.02%; p=0.005).
Conclusions
A global payment and accountable care model introduced in Massachusetts USA (in which a health insurer provided care providers with fixed prepayments to cover most or all of their patients’ care during a specified time period, incentivizing providers to keep their patients’ healthy and reduce costs) did not lead to sizable changes in substance use disorder service use during the first three years following its implementation.