2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The early Vinča culture in Transylvania: Considerations regarding its chronological position using correspondence analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having defined the typology to be used, the statistical analysis is the next step in the process. Correspondence analysis (CA) of pottery types was chosen, as it already showed great potential on Vinča style pottery for determining evolutionary phases and trends (Schier 1996;Diaconescu et al 2020), both on the type site and in the peripheral areas. Correspondence analysis of archaeological material is not a novelty, it has been around for the better part of a half a century already (Baxter 1994: 101), but its popularity grew with the rapid development of personal computing in the 1990's.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having defined the typology to be used, the statistical analysis is the next step in the process. Correspondence analysis (CA) of pottery types was chosen, as it already showed great potential on Vinča style pottery for determining evolutionary phases and trends (Schier 1996;Diaconescu et al 2020), both on the type site and in the peripheral areas. Correspondence analysis of archaeological material is not a novelty, it has been around for the better part of a half a century already (Baxter 1994: 101), but its popularity grew with the rapid development of personal computing in the 1990's.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having defined the typology to be used, the statistical analysis is the next step in the process. Correspondence analysis (CA) of pottery types was chosen, as it already showed great potential on Vinča style pottery for determining evolutionary phases and trends (Schier 1996;Diaconescu et al 2020), both on the type site and in the peripheral areas. Correspondence analysis of archaeological material is not a novelty, it has been around for the better part of a half a century already (Baxter 1994: 101), but its popularity grew with the rapid development of personal computing in the 1990's.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%