1990
DOI: 10.2508/chikusan.61.666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Eating and Rumination Behaviour in Sheep Fed the Silages Made from the Fibrous Residues of Broad Bean (Vicia faba L.) and Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) with Timothy (Phleum pratense L.) Hay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described in the previous report12), the volume (not weight) and/or bulk of feed ingested could also function as an another stimulus to raise rumination after eating, and then the difference in the lag time between silage feeding and hay feeding should be partially due to a difference in the bulk of feed in both experiments, even if the feeding level as weight of dry matter eaten (% of body weight of animal) is almost the same. From the results obtained in this study and the previous experiments6, 8,13), it can be concluded that a stimulus to the mechanoreceptor on the rumen wall is a more important factor in the initiation after eating, as compared with that of the chemo-receptor.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…As described in the previous report12), the volume (not weight) and/or bulk of feed ingested could also function as an another stimulus to raise rumination after eating, and then the difference in the lag time between silage feeding and hay feeding should be partially due to a difference in the bulk of feed in both experiments, even if the feeding level as weight of dry matter eaten (% of body weight of animal) is almost the same. From the results obtained in this study and the previous experiments6, 8,13), it can be concluded that a stimulus to the mechanoreceptor on the rumen wall is a more important factor in the initiation after eating, as compared with that of the chemo-receptor.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Particle size reduction through re-mastication of the feed improves rumen microbial and fermentation activities (Welch and Smith, 1969). Rumination behaviour is closely related to the amount of feed ingested (Gordon, 1965; and is influenced by changes in physical properties and/or chemical composition of feed ingested (Gordon, 1958;Fujihara, 1980;Fujihara and Nakao, 1990a;Mawuenyegah et al, 1997). Rumination is initiated by the presence of ruminal ingesta by chemical and/or physical stimuli to receptors in the rumen wall (Fujihara et al, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%