1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01027467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ECMWF medium-range prediction models development of the numerical formulations and the impact of increased resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
134
0
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
134
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Another example of differences in simulation which can be attributed solely to numerical methods is given by Simmons et al (1989). It would require further experimentation to determine unambiguously the mechanisms by which the differences in numerical techniques result in the observed differences of the tropical intraseasonal oscillations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example of differences in simulation which can be attributed solely to numerical methods is given by Simmons et al (1989). It would require further experimentation to determine unambiguously the mechanisms by which the differences in numerical techniques result in the observed differences of the tropical intraseasonal oscillations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De-tided timeseries were reviewed and surge residuals exceeding 0.5 m were considered as major surge events. The isolated surges were then hindcast by the model, forced from two 8 atmospheric datasets: regional reanalysis ERA-40 data (Uppala et al 2005) for the period 1959-1991 and operational model level first-guess data (Simmons et al 1989) from year 1991 onwards. These datasets were obtained from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and consisted of mean sea level pressure and 10 m wind fields at 3-hour temporal resolution.…”
Section: Numerical Model Set-up and Simulation Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] ECHAM5 is a GCM developed at the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology based on the numerical weather prediction model of the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) [Simmons et al, 1989]. The prognostic variables of the model are vorticity, divergence, temperature, and surface pressure and are represented in the horizontal by truncated series of spherical harmonics.…”
Section: Echam5 General Circulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%