The ecology of relationships

Abstract

Locations where individuals meet romantic partners may influence the composition and perceived extent of network social support for relationships. In this article, we use indepth qualitative interviews to examine how 62 cohabiting couples (124 individuals) met their romantic partners, whether this differentiates respondents' perceptions of support for their relationships, and how this varies by social class. Many of the cohabiting couples in our sample met through friends and family members who can be considered strong ties. Couples also frequently reported meeting in the community, often while pursuing hobbies. Shared network ties and common interests are often attributed to facilitating the progression of relationships. Couples who met through more anomic settings-at a bar or via the Internet-less often viewed their ways of meeting as socially acceptable; many of these couples devised cover stories to tell others about how they met. Our results suggest that those who meet via weak ties perceive lower levels of support for their unions. Working-class couples meet in more anomic settings or through weaker ties more frequently than their middle-class counterparts. Results are interpreted in light of their implications for the diverging family outcomes of working-class and middle-class young adults.

Socioeconomic Status and Intimate Relationships

“…In contrast, private and select spaces, by restricting access to individuals who share a class and a background, are likely to promote homogamy and thereby higher levels of social approval and support for couples. Studies drawing from survey data and in-depth interviews show that couples at lower levels of SES are more likely to meet each other in public spaces, whereas couples at higher levels of SES are more likely to meet each other in private or select spaces (Lampard, 2007;Sassler & Miller, 2014a). In other words, disadvantaged individuals are more likely to meet partners in contexts that exacerbate their disadvantages, whereas advantaged individuals are more likely to meet partners in contexts that consolidate their advantages.…”