2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The economic and health burdens of diseases caused by group A Streptococcus in New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the Australian cost was limited to the health care sector perspective for children hospitalised with iGAS, comparison is made with the annual cost of all non-hospitalised GAS pharyngitis disease in children ($284 and $684 million 2019 USD), and with the annual direct healthcare costs in New Zealand associated with all GAS disease across children and adults at $46 million 2019 USD [ 6 ]. In Australia, the true costs may be considerably higher as this estimation draws on a minimum rate, it is expected that some patients would have needed ongoing follow-up care beyond the 6-month follow-up period, and it is exclusive of indirect costs such as parental loss of income associated with caring for the child which is included in the US study [ 6 ]. Based on the US study [ 6 ], the inclusion of indirect costs, such as parental lost work, could potentially double the financial burden of the current iGAS in Australia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the Australian cost was limited to the health care sector perspective for children hospitalised with iGAS, comparison is made with the annual cost of all non-hospitalised GAS pharyngitis disease in children ($284 and $684 million 2019 USD), and with the annual direct healthcare costs in New Zealand associated with all GAS disease across children and adults at $46 million 2019 USD [ 6 ]. In Australia, the true costs may be considerably higher as this estimation draws on a minimum rate, it is expected that some patients would have needed ongoing follow-up care beyond the 6-month follow-up period, and it is exclusive of indirect costs such as parental loss of income associated with caring for the child which is included in the US study [ 6 ]. Based on the US study [ 6 ], the inclusion of indirect costs, such as parental lost work, could potentially double the financial burden of the current iGAS in Australia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Australia, the true costs may be considerably higher as this estimation draws on a minimum rate, it is expected that some patients would have needed ongoing follow-up care beyond the 6-month follow-up period, and it is exclusive of indirect costs such as parental loss of income associated with caring for the child which is included in the US study [ 6 ]. Based on the US study [ 6 ], the inclusion of indirect costs, such as parental lost work, could potentially double the financial burden of the current iGAS in Australia. It is currently unknown how long-term iGAS related disabilities, beyond the 6-month follow up period, would impact the cost estimates, or if long term costs would be covered by the public health system, the National Disability Insurance Scheme, or privately through health insurance or out-of-pocket costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the greatest burden is attributed to postinfection complications that can cause lifelong injuries and premature deaths, such as acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Estimations of global disease burden show alarming figures of 16–30 million severe and invasive disease cases, and 200 000–300 000 deaths in a given year 3‐6 . Despite being effective in treating infections, antibiotics have failed to reduce disease burden in less privileged areas where invasive GAS infections still cause high mortality rates, and superficial manifestations continue to consume substantial health care resources 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the Editor: The toll of group A Streptococcus is dramatically unappreciated, despite increasing evidence of its burden 1 . In Australia and New Zealand, we recently demonstrated that group A streptococcal throat and skin infections cause a sizable burden at the population level — cellulitis is the main contributor to the total burden of all group A streptococcal diseases and acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease contribute disproportionately relative to their frequency of occurrence 2,3 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%