The Economic Burden of Personality Disorders in Mental Health Care

Abstract

Some evidence suggests that personality disorders are associated with a high economic burden due to, for example, a high demand on psychiatric, health, and social care services. However, state-of-the-art cost studies for the broad range of personality disorder diagnoses are lacking. The present study examines the direct medical costs, as well as the indirect costs, of patients seeking mental health treatment with DSM-IV personality disorders. Method: The 1740 subjects included in this study were recruited from March 2003 to March 2006 from 6 different mental health care institutes in the Netherlands specializing in the psychotherapeutic treatment of personality disorders. The direct and indirect costs were assessed using the Trimbos and Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Questionnaire on Costs Associated with Psychiatric Illness. Personality disorders were diagnosed using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality. Results: The mean total costs of the personality disorder group in the 12 months prior to treatment were €11,126 per patient. Two thirds (66.5%) of these costs consisted of direct medical costs, while the remaining costs were related to productivity losses. Borderline and obsessivecompulsive personality disorders were uniquely associated with increased mean total costs. Conclusions: Treatment-seeking patients with personality disorders pose a high economic burden on society, a burden substantially higher than that found in, for instance, depression or generalized anxiety disorder. These high societal costs present a strong argument in favor of prioritizing effective personality disorder treatments in reimbursement decisions.

Comorbidity of personality disorders in anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis of 30 years of research

“…First, the degree of fear and phobic avoidance (Dreessen et al, 1994;Kose et al, 2009) is usually more pronounced in patients with axis II compared with axis I comorbidity, as well as the level of general psychopathology (Dreessen et al, 1994;Ozkan and Altindag, 2005). This is also reflected in analyses of health care costs showing that axis II PD patients represent a markedly higher economic burden to the health care system than for example depression and anxiety patients (Soeteman et al, 2008). Moreover, having a PD represents a strong vulnerability factor for developing other axis I disorders (Stein et al, 1993).…”

The Norwegian Twin Registry from a Public Health Perspective: A Research Update

“…Compared to mental disorders like major depression, psychoses, and anxiety disorders (called axis I disorders), social and economic consequences of PDs (called axis II disorders) have been studied to a limited degree only. The consequences of PDs, however, seem to be equal to or even exceed those of major depressive disorder (MDD; Gunderson et al, 2011;Skodol et al, 2002Skodol et al, , 2007Soeteman et al, 2008). Mental disorders, both axis I and axis II disorders, are thus highly relevant in the public health perspective, and research in order to increase knowledge of risk factors, causes, prevention, and treatment is one of the main priorities by the NIPH.…”

"Medtep DBT": A Dialectical Behavior Therapy Native App and Web Platform for Borderline Personality Disorder Patients and Their Therapists

“…Personality Disorders imply enormous direct and indirect costs, summing up to 11.120 € per patient per year, whereby BPD and obsessive-compulsive disorders highly contribute to this mean cost [8]. Indirect and direct costs solely for BPD patients amount to 16.852 €, which results in one of the considerably highest economic burdens within patients with personality disorders [9]. These expenses gain even more importance when taking into account that around 6% of primary care patients are diagnosed with BPD [11].…”