1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb02807.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The economic costs of alcohol-related absenteeism and reduced productivity among the working population of New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
2
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
37
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of any recent research an estimate of 25% reduction in working efficiency (US General Accounting Office, 1970) has been used. This is the figure also used by Chetwynd & Rayner (1985) and Jones, Casswell & Zhang (1995). The number of alcohol abusers and their employment rates were used to determine the numbers in paid employment.…”
Section: Production Lossesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the absence of any recent research an estimate of 25% reduction in working efficiency (US General Accounting Office, 1970) has been used. This is the figure also used by Chetwynd & Rayner (1985) and Jones, Casswell & Zhang (1995). The number of alcohol abusers and their employment rates were used to determine the numbers in paid employment.…”
Section: Production Lossesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are two primary mechanisms through which (misuse of) alcohol may lead to undesirable labor market outcomes (e.g. Jones et al, 1995). First, it leads to increased absenteeism from work in the short run and to health problems in the long run.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excessive consumption may reduce productivity in the workplace through complex mechanisms affecting cognitive, cardiac, and liver functioning (Heien 1996;Jones, Casswell, and Zhang 1995;Mullahy and Sindelar 1996;Harwood, Fountain, and Livermore 1998). High rates of use not only may directly affect a person's capacity to perform some tasks but also may exacerbate other underlying deficiencies (e.g., a learning disability) or make employers less willing to accommodate an employee's alcohol-and nonalcohol-related disability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%