The Economic Effects of IFRS Goodwill Reporting

Abstract

The promotion of the international harmonisation of goodwill accounting has led to the approval of SFAS 141 and 142 and IFRS 3, IAS 36 and IAS 38. The aim was to improve the quality and comparability of financial statements through these standards by eliminating the pooling of interests method and substituting the application of amortisation with an annual impairment test. However, recent decisions by regulating bodies such as the FASB, the IASB and the European Parliament have compromised this harmonisation. Currently, steps are being taken to reintroduce systematic amortisation in conjunction with the impairment test. In this dual normative scenario, where two accounting methods coexist (impairment test or amortisation), we analyse the economic consequences of the application of one method over the other in the information transmitted by the firms listed in the Spanish securities market. The contrast of two periods, pre- IFRS (1998to 2004) and post-IFRS (2005, reveals that the application of either of these methods affects financial statements and the usefulness of the information. Therefore, the possibility of opting for one or the other could distort the quality and comparability of the information transmitted by firms and the accurate assessment of future cash flows.

The Methods and evaluation of RIC Integrated Business Indicators

“…[20], Spanish scientists Amorós Martínez, A. Cavero Rubio, J.A. [21], as well as from Italy, Switzerland and England Mazzi, F. André, P. Dionysiou, D. Tsalavoutas, I. [22] devoted their research papers to business consolidation analysis.…”

Machine Learning and Expert Judgement: Analyzing Emerging Topics in Accounting and Finance Research in the Asia–Pacific

“…). In addition to the overall outcomes of IFRS adoptions, there have been studies investigating the impact of specific standards, for example, the impact of IFRS 8 on the usefulness of segment reports from an investor's perspective (Kajüter and Nienhaus, ) and the economic consequences of the promotion of IFRS 3, IAS 36, and IAS 38 (Amorós Martínez and Cavero Rubio, ).…”