2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-019-00699-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The economic impact of city–county consolidations: a synthetic control approach

Abstract: Although more rapid development is a primary motivation behind city-county consolidations, relatively few empirical papers explore the actual impact of consolidation on development. This study uses the synthetic control method (SCM) to examine the long-term impact of city-county consolidations on per capita income, population, and employment. The results from the three cases explored indicate that consolidation does not guarantee development and can actually have negative effects. Additionally, the effects var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In many ways, these consolidations are the pinnacle of the government reform movement by drastically reducing the number of general-purpose governments in a county (in the ideal consolidation, a reduction to one local government). In general, these find no evidence that city-county consolidation drives economic development (Carr et al, 2006;Carr & Feiock, 1999, 2004Feiock & Carr, 1997;Hall et al, 2019;Savitch et al, 2010). Overall, these analyses provide little evidence the government reform perspective leads to economic growth; however, these studies are largely unable to shed light on the polycentric perspective as they only study a particular government reform.…”
Section: Government Reformmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In many ways, these consolidations are the pinnacle of the government reform movement by drastically reducing the number of general-purpose governments in a county (in the ideal consolidation, a reduction to one local government). In general, these find no evidence that city-county consolidation drives economic development (Carr et al, 2006;Carr & Feiock, 1999, 2004Feiock & Carr, 1997;Hall et al, 2019;Savitch et al, 2010). Overall, these analyses provide little evidence the government reform perspective leads to economic growth; however, these studies are largely unable to shed light on the polycentric perspective as they only study a particular government reform.…”
Section: Government Reformmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…3 Other papers that investigate the economic effects of territorial reforms also apply the SCM approach see Roesel (2017), Dalmazzo, de Blasio, and Poy (2018) and Hall, Matti, and Zhou (2020).…”
Section: The Scm For State-level Aggregated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, existing literature on the centralization of human services is yet to reach a conclusive result (Hall, Matti, & Zhou, 2017). Some scholars find that consolidation is an efficient way to deliver services because large regional organizations take advantage of economies of scale, specialization, and standardization (especially with regard to human resources and information technology; Hall et al, 2017). A Note.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…larger agency can also facilitate cooperation between different counties and reduce socially inefficient competition (Hall et al, 2017). In addition, consolidation may expand the type of services available to seniors in a given region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%