Treatment-Resistant Mood Disorders 2001
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511666421.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The economic impact of treatment non-response in major depressive disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We explored only health care costs and it is widely reported that effective treatment of depression often produces even greater reductions in indirect costs. Furthermore, a study of over 1600 patients with depression using a Medicaid programme in California, USA, demonstrated that those with treatment-resistant depression cost US$5321 (about £4000) more in total health care in the first year than patients who responded to acute treatment (McCoombs et al , 2001). Taken as a whole, the above findings suggest that efficient treatment of depression can be achieved if higher costs in the short term are balanced by better outcomes and therefore lower marginal costs in the long term (Sturm & Wells, 1995; Wells et al , 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We explored only health care costs and it is widely reported that effective treatment of depression often produces even greater reductions in indirect costs. Furthermore, a study of over 1600 patients with depression using a Medicaid programme in California, USA, demonstrated that those with treatment-resistant depression cost US$5321 (about £4000) more in total health care in the first year than patients who responded to acute treatment (McCoombs et al , 2001). Taken as a whole, the above findings suggest that efficient treatment of depression can be achieved if higher costs in the short term are balanced by better outcomes and therefore lower marginal costs in the long term (Sturm & Wells, 1995; Wells et al , 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%