2008
DOI: 10.3386/w13810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
275
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(288 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(77 reference statements)
7
275
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with a large body of evidence summarized in Borghans et al (2008) and Almlund et al (2011) and some of the papers in this issue that show that psychological capabilities change over the lifetime, although there is substantial persistence in them.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is consistent with a large body of evidence summarized in Borghans et al (2008) and Almlund et al (2011) and some of the papers in this issue that show that psychological capabilities change over the lifetime, although there is substantial persistence in them.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…These five factors have been known as Big Five since Goldberg (1971). Big Five Factors were determined as Openness to Experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness and Neuroticism or Emotional Stability (Borghans et al 2008). This model reflects considerations regarding the world and their interaction with world according to their personality traits by showing the behavioral tendencies of individuals.…”
Section: Outlook On Risk In Terms Of Behavioral Finance and Financialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concurrent studies of personality and risky activity like drinking in young adults show a strong predictability of substance use from sensation seeking but practically no correlation with anxiety or neuroticism [17] [18] [19]. [20] Suggest that personality may help explain the apparent inconsistency, offering support to [21] ,who argument that economists should consider a multi-domain approach to measuring risk attitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%