The Economics of International Differences in Educational Achievement

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu The cross-country comparative approach provides a number of unique advantages over national studies: It can exploit institutional variation that does not exist within countries; draw on much larger variation than usually available within any country; reveal whether any result is country-specific or more general; test whether effects are systematically heterogeneous in different settings; circumvent selection issues that plague within-country identification by using system-level aggregated measures; and uncover general-equilibrium effects that often elude studies in a single country. The advantages come at the price of concerns about the limited number of country observations, the cross-sectional character of most available achievement data, and possible bias from unobserved country factors like culture. This chapter reviews the economic literature on international differences in educational achievement, restricting itself to comparative analyses that are not possible within single countries and placing particular emphasis on studies trying to address key issues of empirical identification. While quantitative input measures show little impact, several measures of institutional structures and of the quality of the teaching force can account for significant portions of the large international differences in the level and equity of student achievement. Variations in skills measured by the international tests are in turn strongly related to individual labor-market outcomes and, perhaps more importantly, to cross-country variations in economic growth. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SJEL Classification: I20, O40, O15, H40, H52, J24, J31, P50

Unexpected school reform: Academisation of primary schools in England

“…4 In the English context, academy schools operate outside local authority control, having autonomy to operate in areas such as hiring and pay of teachers, schools admissions (subject to national rules), curriculum (subject to some conditions), and decisions about the length of the school day and term. Many of these areas fall within the sphere of process and personnel decisions which are claimed in some economics of education research to exert positive effects on student outcomes because of superior information held by local decision makers (Hanushek and Woessmann, 2011). Indeed, the first secondary schools in England to become academies (in the early 2000s) did seem to deliver positive effects on student outcomes (Eyles and Machin, 2015).…”

What Can We Learn from International Evidence on Trends in Income Distribution?

“…Rather, the characteristics of educational systems (for instance, in terms of decentralisation and choice) seem a more important determinant (Schuetz, Ursprung and Woessmann, 2008;Björklund and Salvanes, 2011;and Hanuschek and Woessman, 2011). Without structural reform of those systems, it is unclear why greater spending would lead to better outcomes -and with structural reform, it may not be needed or efficient (in the sense of yielding benefits that exceed costs).…”

Counting Rotten Apples: Student Achievement and Score Manipulation in Italian Elementary Schools

“…International comparisons of standardized tests on cognitive skills from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) persistently show Italy at the bottom of achievement league tables (Bratti et al 2007, Hanushek andWoessmann, 2011). PISA scores also show that, within Italy, Northerners do better than Southerners (see PISA 2012).…”