1996
DOI: 10.6028/nist.ir.5864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The economics of new-technology materials:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The term C t is the sum of all costs that occur in year t and T is the number of years in the study period (Ehlen and Marshall 1996). The discount rate d, for converting time t costs to time 0, was obtained from the Office of Management and Budget Circular no.…”
Section: Unit Cost Due To Mrandr Actions In Concrete Bridge Decksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term C t is the sum of all costs that occur in year t and T is the number of years in the study period (Ehlen and Marshall 1996). The discount rate d, for converting time t costs to time 0, was obtained from the Office of Management and Budget Circular no.…”
Section: Unit Cost Due To Mrandr Actions In Concrete Bridge Decksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different unit or hourly user costs are found in Table 6. Reference values for C VOC and C delay can be found in Ehlen and Marshall (1996) and Wall and Smith (1998). Figure 7 illustrates the results of the life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) that was evaluated using the present value life cycle cost (PVLCC) approach.…”
Section: Multiobjective Decision-making For Design and Management Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…User costs include the travel delay costs, vehicle-operating costs and accident/crash costs (Hawk 2003, Golabi et al 1993, Ehlen and Marshall 1996. Users' costs increase with increasing traffic volume and increasing duration and disruption of the maintenance or rehabilitation activity.…”
Section: Minimization Of Bridge Users Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, researchers have attempted to include environmental costs in LCCA to consider bridge structure sustainability (Geryasio and da Silva 2008; Kendall et al 2008). LCCA has also been performed on pre-cast composite bridge decks (Hastak et al 2003;Ehlen and Marshall 1996;Ehlen 1999;Meiarashi et al 2002;Nystrom et al 2003;Chandler 2004). Additional work on LCCA was conducted that emphasized inclusion of cost, deterioration, and load uncertainties (Frangopol et al 2001;Thoft-Christensen 2009;Daigle and Lounis 2006;Furuta et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%