2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The economics of timber supply: Does it pay to reduce harvest levels?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principle of even-flow sustained yield and the basic concepts of sustainable forestry advise caution in boosting harvest levels above the long-run sustained yield [12]. While it may be economically optimal to draw down timber stocks to in order to pay for infrastructure, or to accumulate growing stock rather than process wood products under unfavourable market conditions [12,13,61], even-flow sustained yield is nevertheless desired for reasons of employment stability and community well-being. It may yet turn out that the biggest impact of the mountain pine beetle outbreak to the fabric of British Columbia is not the number of trees killed by the insect, but disruptive spikes and lulls in the rate of logging.…”
Section: Bridging the Timber Supply Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle of even-flow sustained yield and the basic concepts of sustainable forestry advise caution in boosting harvest levels above the long-run sustained yield [12]. While it may be economically optimal to draw down timber stocks to in order to pay for infrastructure, or to accumulate growing stock rather than process wood products under unfavourable market conditions [12,13,61], even-flow sustained yield is nevertheless desired for reasons of employment stability and community well-being. It may yet turn out that the biggest impact of the mountain pine beetle outbreak to the fabric of British Columbia is not the number of trees killed by the insect, but disruptive spikes and lulls in the rate of logging.…”
Section: Bridging the Timber Supply Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ministry of Forests, Mining, and Lands 2010) and these types of morphological characteristics are unlikely to develop under those conditions. Relative to the time scales of conventional industrial harvest rotations (Binkley 1987;Mathey et al 2009), these types of old trees cannot meaningfully be considered a renewable resource. Such a perspective is not new; scholars and Indigenous groups have questioned the sustainability of industrial cedar harvesting for decades (Green 2007;Minore 1983;Russo and Zubalik 1992;Yazzie 2007;Zahn et al 2018).…”
Section: An Industrial Forestry Paradigm Hinders Stewardship Of Long-lived Cultural Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-declining even flow is a constraint imposed on timber harvests in National Forests in the USA as required by legislation enacted during the 1970s (Behan 1977). Much has written about this legislation and its implications (e.g., Walker 1977, Lenard 1981, Wilkinson 1984, McQuillan 1989, Howard 2001, Mathey et al 2009, but the implication is that it has enshrined the concept of "equal annual yields forever" (Behan 1977) as a central tenet of sustainability. However, a more thoughtful analysis of resource management reveals that non-declining even flow is neither necessary nor sufficient for sustainable forestry, and that it is preferable to focus on the post-intervention stand condition rather than the sequence of harvests (Vanclay 1995, 1996, Howard 2001.…”
Section: Distractions and Diversionsmentioning
confidence: 99%