The ECVAM International Validation Study on In Vitro Tests for Acute Skin Irritation: Selection of Test Chemicals

Abstract

The ECVAM-funded skin irritation validation study (SIVS) was initiated in 2003, with the aim to evaluate whether the EpiDerm™, EPISKIN™ and the SIFT alternative methods were able to reliably identify skin irritant and non-irritant chemicals, and could therefore be candidates for replacing the rabbit Draize test for skin irritation. The primary goal of the study was to evaluate the predictive capacity of the assays with regard to the EU classification system, which employs the risk phrases, “R38”, for skin irritants, and “no label” for non-irritants. A secondary objective was the retrospective analysis of the data, to assess whether the in vitro tests would be able to discriminate between strong irritants (category 2), mild irritants (category 3) and non-irritants (no category), as defined by the OECD and United Nations proposal for a Globally Harmonised System (GHS) for the classification and labelling of dermal irritancy. A Chemicals Selection Sub-Committee (CSSC) was appointed to identify test chemicals to be used in the SIVS, for which existing, high quality in vivo data were available, with which to correlate the in vitro measurements. Since chemicals from the European Centre for the Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) database of reference chemicals for skin irritation/skin corrosion had been extensively used in preceding studies, the CSSC made use of novel sources for potential test chemicals. The first source of chemicals screened was the New Chemicals Database (NCD), which is the central archive within the EU notification scheme for ‘new’ commercial chemicals. Data registered in the NCD originate from standard assays, submitted in compliance with the legislation which regulates the marketing of industrial chemicals, and are subject to quality assurance by the competent authorities of the EU Member States. In addition, to obtain ‘existing’ chemicals which were readily available from major manufacturing and/or distribution sources, additional databases were surveyed, such as the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) database maintained by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the ECETOC database, with the exclusion of the chemicals used in the previous optimisation and prevalidation phases. A total of approximately 3500 chemicals from the NCD and 1600 from the additional databases were screened. Pre-determined selection criteria were applied, primarily to ensure the quality of the in vivo data and the practicability of their use in testing. Overall, the number of chemicals fulfilling the CSSC selection criteria was found to be limited, particularly in the case of GHS category 2 chemicals. However, a total set of 60 chemicals were selected and proposed to the Management Team of the SIVS for independent coding and supply to the participating laboratories. The selected chemicals: i) represented statistically justified sample sizes for distinguishing R38 from no-label chemicals; ii) provided a balanced representation of the three GHS categories, to allow for the post hoc evaluation of th...

Skin corrosion and irritation test of sunscreen nanoparticles using reconstructed 3D human skin model

“…Many chemicals were tested for corrosion based on the previous TG 431 (2004) before the adoption of the new revised TG431 (2013) [34]. Also international validation studies were performed with in vitro tests for acute skin irritation and many chemicals were tested [35]. However, no reports have been published yet on skin corrosion and irritation based on the revised guidelines.…”

Validating and troubleshooting ocular in vitro toxicology tests

“…Eskes et al (2005) advance these methods from the perspective of relevance, role of developers, known users, applications, limitations, recommendations, as well as inclusion of short descriptions. Even the selection of test chemicals has been coordinated for the ECVAM-funded skin irritation validation study (SIVS), whose aim is to evaluate whether the EpiDerm™, EPISKIN™ and the mouse skin integrity function test (SIFT) are able to reliably identify skin irritant and non-irritant chemicals (Eskes et al , 2007). The protocols include: isolated organ methods (BCOP, IRE, CEET), organotypic models (HET-CAM, CAM-VA, CAM-TB), reconstituted human tissue models (MatTek EpiOcular™, SkinEthic HCE™, HCE-TER), cell-based cytotoxicity methods (NRU, NRR, RBC hemolysis), and cell function-based assays (FL, SM)2.…”

Modeling of protein and phenolic compound removal from aqueous solutions by electrocoagulation

“…For the treatment of superficial wounds, autologous or allogenic epidermal grafts are available [9, 10]. Furthermore, epidermal models have been developed and commercialized by different companies for the assessment of the irritative and corrosive potential of substances [11–18]. Of these, three have already been validated by the European Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods for skin corrosion and skin irritation [19].…”