2020
DOI: 10.1111/geb.13151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The edaphic control of plant diversity

Abstract: Background The central thesis of plant ecology is that climate determines the global distribution of vegetation. Within a vegetation type, however, finer‐scale environmental features, such as the physical and chemical properties of soil (edaphic variation), control patterns of plant diversity and distributions. Aims Here, we review the literature to provide a mechanistic framework for the edaphic control of plant diversity. First, we review three examples where soils have known, prevalent effects on plant dive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 205 publications
(315 reference statements)
5
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Site area can mediate changes in biodiversity within refugia through several mechanisms. First, larger sites are more likely to contain a greater variety of environmental conditions (Bell et al, 1993;Hulshof and Spasojevic, 2020), which may buffer environmental change. This may be the case in alpine systems where stark topography leads to differential distribution of snow on the landscape, creating strong gradients in stress exposure and resource availability and generating a complex mosaic of distinct vegetation types that differ greatly in species composition and productivity (Bowman and Fisk, 2001;Walker et al, 2001;Bowman et al, 2003;Seastedt et al, 2004;Litaor et al, 2008).…”
Section: Landscape Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Site area can mediate changes in biodiversity within refugia through several mechanisms. First, larger sites are more likely to contain a greater variety of environmental conditions (Bell et al, 1993;Hulshof and Spasojevic, 2020), which may buffer environmental change. This may be the case in alpine systems where stark topography leads to differential distribution of snow on the landscape, creating strong gradients in stress exposure and resource availability and generating a complex mosaic of distinct vegetation types that differ greatly in species composition and productivity (Bowman and Fisk, 2001;Walker et al, 2001;Bowman et al, 2003;Seastedt et al, 2004;Litaor et al, 2008).…”
Section: Landscape Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in species richness by other drivers, such as nutrient levels, species introductions, and dispersal lags, are often context-dependent and hence difficult to predict. For example, edaphic variation, including variation in nutrient content, is hypothesized to strongly influence establishment, ecological drift, and niche selection, which all affect the local species pool, and this in turn affects richness (9). Experimental approaches have shown a non-linear impact of fertilization on Arctic plant richness and their ecosystem functions (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edaphic variation is hypothesized to strongly influence establishment, ecological drift, and niche selection, which all affect the local species pool, and this in turn affects species richness (Hulshof & Spasojevic, 2020). An overall greater species richness has been reported from calcareous as compared with siliceous bedrock areas in the eastern Swiss Alps (Holzinger et al , 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in conjunction with climatic niche preferences, complex varieties maguirei, domensis , and nevadensis are found on the cliffs and crevices of exclusively limestone substrates. While it’s unclear whether these habitats are tied to mineral or pH constraints, or simply reflect preferences for moisture-retentive substrates, edaphic heterogeneity is known to contribute to plant speciation and biodiversity, both globally (Hulshof and Spasojevic 2020) and within the Great Basin (e.g. de Queiroz et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%