The educational upgrading of Japanese youth, 1982–2007: Are all Japanese youth ready for structural reforms?

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SIZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. Are all Japanese youth ready for the structural reforms proposed as a supply-side policy of Abenomics? To answer this question, we assess how well Japanese youth have coped with the labor market's long-term structural changes, induced primarily by deepening interdependence with emerging economies and rapid technological progress over the last three decades. We examine the role of educational upgrading on the labor-market outcomes of youth between the ages of 25 and 29, using six waves of micro data from the Employment Status Survey spanning from 1982 to 2007. The analysis demonstrates that the demand growth for skilled labor relative to unskilled labor has been met by the educational upgrading of youth through the expansion of tertiary education, including education in vocational schools. Youth left behind the trend of educational upgrading, however, have suffered significantly from decreasing employment opportunities and deteriorating working conditions. JEL Classification: I23, J21

Young people, precarious work, and the development of youth employment policies in Japan

“…These problems have led its policymakers to focus on the provision of youth employment and labor market policies at the intersection of the education and industrial policies, resulting in close cooperation among the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI), the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, and Science and Technology (MEXT), and the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare (MHLW). By doing so, the government hoped to enable young people to improve their ʻemployabilityʼ in the labor market by upgrading skills and broadening their career experience (Arai et al , 2014). The following section analyzes a series of youth policy measures since the 2000s and the effectiveness and limitations of them in response to Japan's youth problems in the labor market.…”

A Methodological Framework for Designing Personalised Training Programs to Support Personnel Upskilling in Industry 5.0

“…As they combine digital technologies, manufacturing systems are becoming increasingly complex [4][5][6]. Therefore, new technologies require new educational methods to update or upgrade the skills of engineers and blue-collar workers [7][8][9]. Especially in the manufacturing domain, the education of personnel is a necessary and continuous process for keeping up with the pace of changes, increasing the safety and sustainability of manufacturing systems, achieving high-quality production with the least amount of resources, and staying competitive [10].…”