1987
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.1987.325929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The EEG and MEG, Using a Model of Eccentric Spheres to Describe the Head

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these applications, simplified spherical shell (Brazier, 1949; Geisler and Gerstein, 1961; Frank, 1952; Wilson and Bayley, 1950; Hosek et al, 1978; Meijs and Peters, 1987) models can be used and solved with analytical methods, but they neglect the complex anatomy of the head and the brain. Numerous studies have demonstrated that realistic modeling of anatomical structures such as the skull (Dannhauer et al, 2011; Ramon et al, 2004; Chauveau et al, 2004; Lanfer et al, 2012a; Anwander et al, 2002; Ary et al, 1981; Cuffin, 1993; van den Broek et al, 1998; Vorwerk et al, 2014), the dura (Slutzky et al, 2010; Ramon et al, 2014; Ramon, 2012), the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (Ramon et al, 2006; Haueisen et al, 1997; Slutzky et al, 2010; Ramon et al, 2004; van den Broek et al, 1998; Vorwerk et al, 2014; Bangera et al, 2010; Bénar and Gotman, 2002; Lanfer et al, 2012b; Rice et al, 2013; Vanrumste et al, 2000; Wendel et al, 2008) and head extent (Lanfer et al, 2012a; Bruno et al, 2003; Vatta et al, 2005) as well as realistic modeling of anisotropy (Chauveau et al, 2004; Anwander et al, 2002; Vorwerk et al, 2014; Bangera et al, 2010; Haueisen et al, 2002; Güllmar et al, 2010; Wolters et al, 2006; Hallez et al, 2005, 2008, 2009; Rullmann et al, 2009; Wolters, 2003), particularly of the white matter, can substantially improve the accuracy of forward and inverse modeling of EEG signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these applications, simplified spherical shell (Brazier, 1949; Geisler and Gerstein, 1961; Frank, 1952; Wilson and Bayley, 1950; Hosek et al, 1978; Meijs and Peters, 1987) models can be used and solved with analytical methods, but they neglect the complex anatomy of the head and the brain. Numerous studies have demonstrated that realistic modeling of anatomical structures such as the skull (Dannhauer et al, 2011; Ramon et al, 2004; Chauveau et al, 2004; Lanfer et al, 2012a; Anwander et al, 2002; Ary et al, 1981; Cuffin, 1993; van den Broek et al, 1998; Vorwerk et al, 2014), the dura (Slutzky et al, 2010; Ramon et al, 2014; Ramon, 2012), the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (Ramon et al, 2006; Haueisen et al, 1997; Slutzky et al, 2010; Ramon et al, 2004; van den Broek et al, 1998; Vorwerk et al, 2014; Bangera et al, 2010; Bénar and Gotman, 2002; Lanfer et al, 2012b; Rice et al, 2013; Vanrumste et al, 2000; Wendel et al, 2008) and head extent (Lanfer et al, 2012a; Bruno et al, 2003; Vatta et al, 2005) as well as realistic modeling of anisotropy (Chauveau et al, 2004; Anwander et al, 2002; Vorwerk et al, 2014; Bangera et al, 2010; Haueisen et al, 2002; Güllmar et al, 2010; Wolters et al, 2006; Hallez et al, 2005, 2008, 2009; Rullmann et al, 2009; Wolters, 2003), particularly of the white matter, can substantially improve the accuracy of forward and inverse modeling of EEG signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation of the flux through the coil is carried out numerically by approximating the surface integral over each coil by a seven-point Gaussian integration formula (ABRAMOWn'Z and S~GUN, 1972 et al, 1985). The radii and centres of the eccentric spheres are deduced from the realistically shaped head model by optimally fitting a sphere to each compartment boundary in terms of a leastsquares fitting procedure (MEIJS and PETERS, 1987).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This locally optimal dipole moment d is given by: Inserting [4] into [3] makes the cost function K independent of the dipole moment parameters d: [5] Here I m is the m × m identity matrix. The solution of the inverse problem is taken to be the location ŕ, where K has its minimum, together with the locally optimal dipole at r '.…”
Section: Source Localization Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%