“…For these applications, simplified spherical shell (Brazier, 1949; Geisler
and Gerstein, 1961; Frank, 1952;
Wilson and Bayley, 1950; Hosek et al, 1978; Meijs
and Peters, 1987) models can be used and solved with analytical methods,
but they neglect the complex anatomy of the head and the brain. Numerous studies
have demonstrated that realistic modeling of anatomical structures such as the skull
(Dannhauer et al, 2011; Ramon et al, 2004; Chauveau et al, 2004; Lanfer et al,
2012a; Anwander et al, 2002; Ary et al, 1981; Cuffin, 1993; van den
Broek et al, 1998; Vorwerk et al,
2014), the dura (Slutzky et al,
2010; Ramon et al, 2014; Ramon, 2012), the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
(Ramon et al, 2006; Haueisen et al, 1997; Slutzky et al, 2010; Ramon et al,
2004; van den Broek et al, 1998;
Vorwerk et al, 2014; Bangera et al, 2010; Bénar and Gotman, 2002; Lanfer
et al, 2012b; Rice et al, 2013;
Vanrumste et al, 2000; Wendel et al, 2008) and head extent (Lanfer et al, 2012a; Bruno et al, 2003; Vatta et al,
2005) as well as realistic modeling of anisotropy (Chauveau et al, 2004; Anwander et al, 2002; Vorwerk et al,
2014; Bangera et al, 2010; Haueisen et al, 2002; Güllmar et al, 2010; Wolters et al, 2006; Hallez et al, 2005, 2008, 2009; Rullmann
et al, 2009; Wolters, 2003),
particularly of the white matter, can substantially improve the accuracy of forward
and inverse modeling of EEG signals.…”