1966
DOI: 10.1177/001872676601900406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Efects of Physical Deviance upon Face-to-Face Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
132
1
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
132
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…) and in contrast to other disadvantaged groups and minorities they are sometimes evaluated more positively than 'normal' comparison groups (Kleck, 1968;Comer and Piliavin, 1975;Carver, Glass and Katz, 1978;Scheier, Carver, Schulz, Glass and Katz, 1978). Other results suggest that there is a social norm common to Western culture which requires that positive and unprejudiced attitudes be adopted toward the physically handicapped (e.g., Kleck, Ono and Hastorf, 1966;Doob and Ecker, 1970;Snyder, Kleck, Strenta and Mentzer, 1979).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and in contrast to other disadvantaged groups and minorities they are sometimes evaluated more positively than 'normal' comparison groups (Kleck, 1968;Comer and Piliavin, 1975;Carver, Glass and Katz, 1978;Scheier, Carver, Schulz, Glass and Katz, 1978). Other results suggest that there is a social norm common to Western culture which requires that positive and unprejudiced attitudes be adopted toward the physically handicapped (e.g., Kleck, Ono and Hastorf, 1966;Doob and Ecker, 1970;Snyder, Kleck, Strenta and Mentzer, 1979).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kleck et al [37] found able-bodied participants terminated interactions sooner with disabled versus nondisabled individuals. Kleck, Buck, Coller, London, Pfeiffer and Vukcevic [36] also found that increased physical distance occurred in interactions with a disabled versus a nondisabled counterpart, although such findings reduced as more time was spent with the individual with a disability [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, classification of the data began with a focus on (a) issues of change brought about through online access, and (b) the negative and positive impact of the online medium on the lives of people with disabilities. This led to the identification of six central topic areas and sub-topics (identified in brackets) represented in the data: identity construction (12), managing disability identity (37), dangers of participating online (5), conceptualising online technology (7), utility of the online medium (36), and disadvantages (6). The last topic area formed the basis for the present analysis.…”
Section: Preliminary Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a power differential at the social structural level is reproduced within groups or dyads. Such an effect has been shown for several types of social categorizations, such as gender (Ridgeway & Obesity and Empowerment 379 Smith-Lovin, 1999), ethnicity (Katz & Cohen, 1962;Riches & Foddy, 1989) and physical disability (Kleck, Ono, & Hastorf, 1966), for example. Why does this happen?…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%