2019
DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2019.7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of 16S rRNA region choice on bacterial community metabarcoding results

Abstract: In this work, we compare the resolution of V2-V3 and V3-V4 16S rRNA regions for the purposes of estimating microbial community diversity using paired-end Illumina MiSeq reads, and show that the fragment, including V2 and V3 regions, has higher resolution for lower-rank taxa (genera and species). It allows for a more precise distance-based clustering of reads into species-level OTUs. Statistically convergent estimates of the diversity of major species (defined as those that together are covered by 95% of reads)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
217
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
9
217
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, the included studies mostly spanned regions V1–V2 and V3–V4 (Figure ). Regions V1–V2, however, were suggested to yield less reproducible results and to potentially underestimate certain taxa such as Bifidobacterium . Finally, raw sequencing data require several bioinformatic steps to render them interpretable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, the included studies mostly spanned regions V1–V2 and V3–V4 (Figure ). Regions V1–V2, however, were suggested to yield less reproducible results and to potentially underestimate certain taxa such as Bifidobacterium . Finally, raw sequencing data require several bioinformatic steps to render them interpretable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the 16S rRNA gene region(s) for short-read sequencing places an upper bound on the amount of species-level resolution that is achievable within a dataset [38-41]. Therefore, it is key to determine which regions provide the most information for distinguishing bacterial species that are common to that specific ecosystem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, as with other 16S rRNA gene sequencing studies, the taxonomic assignment and resolution is influenced by the particular primer set selected for amplifying the variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene, which may limit comparability with studies based on other primer sets. 85 Second, although 110 women is a relatively large cohort compared to many earlier studies, it is not large enough to detect small effect sizes. Nor was this sample size adequate for us to evaluate whether other health exposures and behaviors that associate with measures of socioeconomic status affect the stability of the microbiota in pregnancy.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 92%