1992
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2797(92)90074-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of 2,2′-dichlorodiethyl sulfide on DNA synthesis of a murine stratified keratinocyte culture system

Abstract: A primary stratified keratinocyte culture resembling the epidermis in situ was used as a model for studying the effects of exposure to 2,2'-dichlorodiethyl sulfide, or sulfur mustard (SM), on DNA synthesis. A method that distinguishes between semi-conservative (s.c.) DNA synthesis and repair synthesis was used to determine if the former was inhibited following treatment with SM. In this method the density of the newly synthesized DNA was increased by incorporation of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine. Density gradient ce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any radioactivity found in the light, parental DNA peak should be the result of DNA repair, while any radioactivity found in the more dense fraction, containing BUdR, should represent DNA replication. An increase in buoyant densities does not occur in the parental peak due to the low amount of BUdR that would be replaced (Roberts et al, 1968;Legator & Flamm, 1973;Hennings & Michael, 1976;Zaman-Saroya et al, 1992). In order to clarify the parental peak, in some experiments the peak DNA content fraction, as measured by A 260 , was rebanded in a second and sometimes a third CsCl gradient.…”
Section: Determination Of Hk Repair Versus Replication Following Bcesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Any radioactivity found in the light, parental DNA peak should be the result of DNA repair, while any radioactivity found in the more dense fraction, containing BUdR, should represent DNA replication. An increase in buoyant densities does not occur in the parental peak due to the low amount of BUdR that would be replaced (Roberts et al, 1968;Legator & Flamm, 1973;Hennings & Michael, 1976;Zaman-Saroya et al, 1992). In order to clarify the parental peak, in some experiments the peak DNA content fraction, as measured by A 260 , was rebanded in a second and sometimes a third CsCl gradient.…”
Section: Determination Of Hk Repair Versus Replication Following Bcesmentioning
confidence: 98%