The Effect of a 3-Minute Mindfulness Intervention, and the Mediating Role of Maximization, on Critical Incident Decision-Making

Abstract

ObjectiveIn this study, we extend the impact of mindfulness to the concept of least-worst decision-making. Least-worst decisions involve high-uncertainty and require the individual to choose between a number of potentially negative courses of action. Research is increasingly exploring least-worst decisions, and real-world events (such as the COVID-19 pandemic) show the need for individuals to overcome uncertainty and commit to a least-worst course of action. From sports to business, researchers are increasingly showing that “being mindful” has a range of positive performance-related benefits. We hypothesized that mindfulness would improve least-worst decision-making because it would increase self-reflection and value identification. However, we also hypothesized that trait maximization (the tendency to attempt to choose the “best” course of action) would negatively interact with mindfulness.MethodsThree hundred and ninety-eight participants were recruited using Amazon MTurk and exposed to a brief mindfulness intervention or a control intervention (listening to an audiobook). After this intervention, participants completed the Least-Worst Uncertain Choice Inventory for Emergency Responders (LUCIFER).ResultsAs hypothesized, mindfulness increased decision-making speed and approach-tendencies. Conversely, for high-maximizers, increased mindfulness caused a slowing of the decision-making process and led to more avoidant choices.ConclusionsThis study shows the potential positive and negative consequences of mindfulness for least-worst decision-making, emphasizing the critical importance of individual differences when considering both the effect of mindfulness and interventions aimed at improving decision-making.

An Evaluation of an Online Brief Mindfulness-Based Intervention in Higher Education: A Pilot Conducted at an Australian University and a British University

“…These findings have been demonstrated in robust randomised controlled trials and supported by meta-analyses (De Vibe et al, 2013;Regehr et al, 2013;Bamber and Kraenzle Schneider, 2016;Dvořáková et al, 2017;Bamber and Morpeth, 2018;Chi et al, 2018;Ma et al, 2019). The evaluation of online MBIs is in its infancy; however, recent meta-analyses found encouraging results for stress reduction (Spijkerman et al, 2016), as well as MBIs that are self-guided (Cavanagh et al, 2014;Ma et al, 2018) and brief, such as three (Shortland et al, 2021) and five minute (Howarth et al, 2019) interventions administered once.…”

Avoidant authority: The effect of organizational power on decision-making in high-uncertainty situations

“…There are also several further questions to be explored. For example, recent research has shown that individual differences in personality characteristics (e.g., maximization) impact the degree to which decision-making is impacted by interventions (Shortland et al, 2021). As such, it is viable to propose that individual differences in certain key personality traits may moderate the effect of power on avoidance.…”

A brief induction of loving kindness meditation to reduce anti-fat bias

“…Then, participants were randomly assigned to either a three-minute LKM intervention or a control condition. The 3-minute dosage and design of the LKM intervention were chosen to reduce participant burden based on previous studies using brief meditation interventions [ 25 , 33 ]. In the LKM condition, participants were instructed to write a message to their recipient (close other or stranger) showing concern about the stigmatizing scenario and wishing them health, happiness, and wellbeing.…”